Irma: Statistics About The Baby Name Irma
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1995 | * | * | * | 953 | 197 | 0.0103% |
1994 | * | * | * | 857 | 229 | 0.0118% |
1993 | * | * | * | 857 | 226 | 0.0115% |
1992 | * | * | * | 835 | 239 | 0.0119% |
1991 | * | * | * | 734 | 283 | 0.0139% |
1990 | * | * | * | 682 | 312 | 0.0152% |
1989 | * | * | * | 748 | 263 | 0.0132% |
1988 | * | * | * | 733 | 255 | 0.0133% |
1987 | * | * | * | 792 | 221 | 0.0118% |
1986 | * | * | * | 771 | 221 | 0.0120% |
1985 | * | * | * | 789 | 212 | 0.0115% |
1984 | * | * | * | 642 | 273 | 0.0152% |
1983 | * | * | * | 749 | 217 | 0.0121% |
1982 | * | * | * | 575 | 317 | 0.0175% |
1981 | * | * | * | 584 | 316 | 0.0177% |
1980 | * | * | * | 560 | 331 | 0.0186% |
1979 | * | * | * | 536 | 349 | 0.0203% |
1978 | * | * | * | 551 | 319 | 0.0194% |
1977 | * | * | * | 562 | 312 | 0.0190% |
1976 | * | * | * | 490 | 371 | 0.0236% |
1975 | * | * | * | 451 | 429 | 0.0275% |
1974 | * | * | * | 468 | 384 | 0.0245% |
1973 | * | * | * | 419 | 467 | 0.0301% |
1972 | * | * | * | 447 | 420 | 0.0261% |
1971 | * | * | * | 435 | 480 | 0.0274% |
1970 | * | * | * | 447 | 489 | 0.0267% |
1969 | * | * | * | 394 | 575 | 0.0326% |
1968 | * | * | * | 405 | 530 | 0.0310% |
1967 | * | * | * | 383 | 573 | 0.0334% |
1966 | * | * | * | 360 | 641 | 0.0365% |
1965 | * | * | * | 335 | 726 | 0.0397% |
1964 | * | * | * | 361 | 688 | 0.0352% |
1963 | * | * | * | 343 | 765 | 0.0385% |
1962 | * | * | * | 339 | 771 | 0.0380% |
1961 | * | * | * | 325 | 842 | 0.0406% |
1960 | * | * | * | 300 | 959 | 0.0461% |
1959 | * | * | * | 291 | 968 | 0.0466% |
1958 | * | * | * | 290 | 951 | 0.0461% |
1957 | * | * | * | 261 | 1,099 | 0.0524% |
1956 | * | * | * | 296 | 908 | 0.0441% |
1955 | * | * | * | 279 | 953 | 0.0476% |
1954 | * | * | * | 275 | 945 | 0.0475% |
1953 | * | * | * | 267 | 936 | 0.0486% |
1952 | * | * | * | 276 | 858 | 0.0451% |
1951 | * | * | * | 255 | 915 | 0.0496% |
1950 | * | * | * | 254 | 892 | 0.0507% |
1949 | * | * | * | 266 | 826 | 0.0471% |
1948 | * | * | * | 262 | 846 | 0.0486% |
1947 | * | * | * | 256 | 853 | 0.0470% |
1946 | * | * | * | 259 | 772 | 0.0480% |
1945 | * | * | * | 260 | 676 | 0.0502% |
1944 | * | * | * | 259 | 704 | 0.0516% |
1943 | * | * | * | 249 | 775 | 0.0541% |
1942 | * | * | * | 247 | 768 | 0.0552% |
1941 | * | * | * | 225 | 773 | 0.0621% |
1940 | * | * | * | 224 | 748 | 0.0633% |
1939 | * | * | * | 223 | 749 | 0.0660% |
1938 | * | * | * | 221 | 766 | 0.0671% |
1937 | * | * | * | 206 | 799 | 0.0726% |
1936 | * | * | * | 220 | 746 | 0.0693% |
1935 | * | * | * | 204 | 835 | 0.0769% |
1934 | * | * | * | 213 | 833 | 0.0770% |
1933 | * | * | * | 209 | 819 | 0.0784% |
1932 | * | * | * | 194 | 949 | 0.0858% |
1931 | * | * | * | 195 | 937 | 0.0850% |
1930 | * | * | * | 180 | 1,084 | 0.0930% |
1929 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,064 | 0.0920% |
1928 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,097 | 0.0919% |
1927 | * | * | * | 178 | 1,168 | 0.0945% |
1926 | * | * | * | 170 | 1,304 | 0.1061% |
1925 | * | * | * | 177 | 1,234 | 0.0978% |
1924 | * | * | * | 179 | 1,267 | 0.0978% |
1923 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,156 | 0.0923% |
1922 | * | * | * | 183 | 1,167 | 0.0936% |
1921 | * | * | * | 164 | 1,379 | 0.1078% |
1920 | * | * | * | 164 | 1,388 | 0.1116% |
1919 | * | * | * | 160 | 1,381 | 0.1176% |
1918 | * | * | * | 167 | 1,331 | 0.1107% |
1917 | * | * | * | 156 | 1,339 | 0.1192% |
1916 | * | * | * | 149 | 1,353 | 0.1247% |
1915 | * | * | * | 142 | 1,310 | 0.1280% |
1914 | * | * | * | 146 | 1,013 | 0.1275% |
1913 | * | * | * | 144 | 826 | 0.1265% |
1912 | * | * | * | 146 | 741 | 0.1266% |
1911 | * | * | * | 136 | 614 | 0.1394% |
1910 | * | * | * | 149 | 545 | 0.1302% |
1909 | * | * | * | 143 | 497 | 0.1353% |
1908 | * | * | * | 142 | 478 | 0.1350% |
1907 | * | * | * | 156 | 409 | 0.1213% |
1906 | * | * | * | 152 | 391 | 0.1248% |
1905 | * | * | * | 141 | 427 | 0.1378% |
1904 | * | * | * | 148 | 360 | 0.1231% |
1903 | * | * | * | 151 | 346 | 0.1244% |
1902 | * | * | * | 146 | 368 | 0.1313% |
1901 | * | * | * | 157 | 304 | 0.1196% |
1900 | * | * | * | 168 | 326 | 0.1025% |
1899 | * | * | * | 164 | 276 | 0.1115% |
1898 | * | * | * | 160 | 319 | 0.1164% |
1897 | * | * | * | 150 | 308 | 0.1241% |
1896 | * | * | * | 166 | 261 | 0.1036% |
1895 | * | * | * | 170 | 247 | 0.1000% |
1894 | * | * | * | 170 | 240 | 0.1017% |
1893 | * | * | * | 170 | 215 | 0.0955% |
1892 | * | * | * | 181 | 194 | 0.0862% |
1891 | * | * | * | 172 | 193 | 0.0982% |
1890 | * | * | * | 191 | 154 | 0.0764% |
1889 | * | * | * | 197 | 134 | 0.0708% |
1888 | * | * | * | 206 | 120 | 0.0633% |
1887 | * | * | * | 219 | 90 | 0.0579% |
1886 | * | * | * | 226 | 81 | 0.0527% |
1885 | * | * | * | 241 | 69 | 0.0486% |
1884 | * | * | * | 245 | 62 | 0.0451% |
1883 | * | * | * | 247 | 53 | 0.0441% |
1882 | * | * | * | 227 | 58 | 0.0501% |
1881 | * | * | * | 269 | 36 | 0.0364% |
1880 | * | * | * | 286 | 30 | 0.0307% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |