Imogene: Statistics About The Baby Name Imogene
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1955 | * | * | * | 956 | 107 | 0.0053% |
1954 | * | * | * | 887 | 117 | 0.0059% |
1953 | * | * | * | 881 | 114 | 0.0059% |
1952 | * | * | * | 730 | 148 | 0.0078% |
1951 | * | * | * | 729 | 143 | 0.0078% |
1950 | * | * | * | 701 | 150 | 0.0085% |
1949 | * | * | * | 684 | 150 | 0.0086% |
1948 | * | * | * | 629 | 173 | 0.0099% |
1947 | * | * | * | 598 | 204 | 0.0112% |
1946 | * | * | * | 531 | 220 | 0.0137% |
1945 | * | * | * | 484 | 225 | 0.0167% |
1944 | * | * | * | 469 | 231 | 0.0169% |
1943 | * | * | * | 450 | 273 | 0.0191% |
1942 | * | * | * | 445 | 270 | 0.0194% |
1941 | * | * | * | 363 | 340 | 0.0273% |
1940 | * | * | * | 336 | 361 | 0.0306% |
1939 | * | * | * | 308 | 408 | 0.0360% |
1938 | * | * | * | 297 | 447 | 0.0392% |
1937 | * | * | * | 279 | 493 | 0.0448% |
1936 | * | * | * | 261 | 537 | 0.0499% |
1935 | * | * | * | 253 | 614 | 0.0565% |
1934 | * | * | * | 226 | 765 | 0.0707% |
1933 | * | * | * | 216 | 786 | 0.0752% |
1932 | * | * | * | 196 | 944 | 0.0854% |
1931 | * | * | * | 201 | 909 | 0.0825% |
1930 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,024 | 0.0879% |
1929 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,178 | 0.1018% |
1928 | * | * | * | 163 | 1,310 | 0.1097% |
1927 | * | * | * | 157 | 1,498 | 0.1212% |
1926 | * | * | * | 172 | 1,251 | 0.1018% |
1925 | * | * | * | 175 | 1,247 | 0.0988% |
1924 | * | * | * | 182 | 1,248 | 0.0963% |
1923 | * | * | * | 200 | 1,000 | 0.0799% |
1922 | * | * | * | 213 | 915 | 0.0734% |
1921 | * | * | * | 223 | 836 | 0.0654% |
1920 | * | * | * | 229 | 805 | 0.0647% |
1919 | * | * | * | 241 | 702 | 0.0598% |
1918 | * | * | * | 258 | 591 | 0.0492% |
1917 | * | * | * | 262 | 563 | 0.0501% |
1916 | * | * | * | 290 | 423 | 0.0390% |
1915 | * | * | * | 279 | 444 | 0.0434% |
1914 | * | * | * | 289 | 334 | 0.0420% |
1913 | * | * | * | 317 | 227 | 0.0348% |
1912 | * | * | * | 349 | 171 | 0.0292% |
1911 | * | * | * | 338 | 137 | 0.0311% |
1910 | * | * | * | 398 | 98 | 0.0234% |
1909 | * | * | * | 350 | 107 | 0.0291% |
1908 | * | * | * | 386 | 87 | 0.0246% |
1907 | * | * | * | 449 | 64 | 0.0190% |
1906 | * | * | * | 467 | 53 | 0.0169% |
1905 | * | * | * | 466 | 53 | 0.0171% |
1904 | * | * | * | 476 | 48 | 0.0164% |
1903 | * | * | * | 433 | 54 | 0.0194% |
1902 | * | * | * | 488 | 42 | 0.0150% |
1901 | * | * | * | 581 | 29 | 0.0114% |
1900 | * | * | * | 436 | 59 | 0.0185% |
1899 | * | * | * | 531 | 32 | 0.0129% |
1898 | * | * | * | 627 | 27 | 0.0098% |
1897 | * | * | * | 465 | 40 | 0.0161% |
1896 | * | * | * | 509 | 34 | 0.0135% |
1895 | * | * | * | 505 | 34 | 0.0138% |
1894 | * | * | * | 587 | 25 | 0.0106% |
1893 | * | * | * | 555 | 26 | 0.0115% |
1892 | * | * | * | 490 | 31 | 0.0138% |
1891 | * | * | * | 550 | 23 | 0.0117% |
1890 | * | * | * | 565 | 22 | 0.0109% |
1889 | * | * | * | 490 | 26 | 0.0137% |
1888 | * | * | * | 537 | 22 | 0.0116% |
1887 | * | * | * | 543 | 17 | 0.0109% |
1886 | * | * | * | 678 | 12 | 0.0078% |
1885 | * | * | * | 872 | 7 | 0.0049% |
1883 | * | * | * | 530 | 14 | 0.0117% |
1882 | * | * | * | 547 | 12 | 0.0104% |
1881 | * | * | * | 457 | 14 | 0.0142% |
1880 | * | * | * | 505 | 12 | 0.0123% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |