Ike: Statistics About The Baby Name Ike
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1957 | 873 | 75 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1956 | 895 | 69 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1955 | 838 | 77 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1954 | 831 | 76 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1953 | 683 | 109 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1952 | 732 | 92 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1951 | 908 | 60 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1950 | 935 | 55 | 0.0030% | * | * | * |
1949 | 850 | 65 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1948 | 855 | 64 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1947 | 856 | 66 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1946 | 863 | 58 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1945 | 840 | 56 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1943 | 837 | 62 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1941 | 921 | 48 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1939 | 964 | 43 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1936 | 987 | 41 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1935 | 934 | 46 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1934 | 913 | 48 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1933 | 842 | 54 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1932 | 1000 | 44 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1931 | 867 | 54 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1930 | 861 | 59 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1929 | 819 | 63 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1928 | 850 | 61 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1927 | 842 | 64 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1926 | 831 | 64 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1925 | 804 | 68 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1924 | 781 | 74 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1923 | 796 | 70 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1922 | 804 | 70 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1921 | 748 | 79 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
1920 | 686 | 87 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1919 | 669 | 86 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
1918 | 746 | 75 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
1917 | 633 | 88 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
1916 | 614 | 91 | 0.0099% | * | * | * |
1915 | 703 | 70 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1914 | 591 | 73 | 0.0107% | * | * | * |
1913 | 623 | 51 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
1912 | 570 | 50 | 0.0111% | * | * | * |
1911 | 474 | 38 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
1910 | 367 | 49 | 0.0235% | * | * | * |
1909 | 334 | 48 | 0.0272% | * | * | * |
1908 | 370 | 39 | 0.0235% | * | * | * |
1907 | 310 | 47 | 0.0297% | * | * | * |
1906 | 434 | 26 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
1905 | 291 | 47 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
1904 | 259 | 55 | 0.0397% | * | * | * |
1903 | 404 | 24 | 0.0186% | * | * | * |
1902 | 300 | 41 | 0.0309% | * | * | * |
1901 | 366 | 26 | 0.0225% | * | * | * |
1900 | 253 | 65 | 0.0400% | * | * | * |
1899 | 241 | 48 | 0.0417% | * | * | * |
1898 | 262 | 47 | 0.0356% | * | * | * |
1897 | 286 | 40 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
1896 | 248 | 54 | 0.0418% | * | * | * |
1895 | 268 | 44 | 0.0347% | * | * | * |
1894 | 276 | 41 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
1893 | 303 | 33 | 0.0273% | * | * | * |
1892 | 250 | 51 | 0.0388% | * | * | * |
1891 | 245 | 42 | 0.0384% | * | * | * |
1890 | 244 | 48 | 0.0401% | * | * | * |
1889 | 226 | 52 | 0.0437% | * | * | * |
1888 | 239 | 53 | 0.0408% | * | * | * |
1887 | 242 | 44 | 0.0402% | * | * | * |
1886 | 248 | 48 | 0.0403% | * | * | * |
1885 | 260 | 41 | 0.0354% | * | * | * |
1884 | 184 | 76 | 0.0619% | * | * | * |
1883 | 219 | 50 | 0.0444% | * | * | * |
1882 | 191 | 67 | 0.0549% | * | * | * |
1881 | 205 | 55 | 0.0508% | * | * | * |
1880 | 259 | 42 | 0.0355% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |