Ida: Statistics About The Baby Name Ida
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1984 | * | * | * | 949 | 153 | 0.0085% |
1983 | * | * | * | 982 | 148 | 0.0083% |
1982 | * | * | * | 788 | 205 | 0.0113% |
1981 | * | * | * | 789 | 205 | 0.0115% |
1980 | * | * | * | 785 | 209 | 0.0118% |
1979 | * | * | * | 708 | 239 | 0.0139% |
1978 | * | * | * | 721 | 218 | 0.0133% |
1977 | * | * | * | 650 | 250 | 0.0152% |
1976 | * | * | * | 682 | 217 | 0.0138% |
1975 | * | * | * | 640 | 239 | 0.0153% |
1974 | * | * | * | 553 | 304 | 0.0194% |
1973 | * | * | * | 547 | 305 | 0.0196% |
1972 | * | * | * | 522 | 325 | 0.0202% |
1971 | * | * | * | 531 | 344 | 0.0196% |
1970 | * | * | * | 511 | 384 | 0.0210% |
1969 | * | * | * | 493 | 389 | 0.0221% |
1968 | * | * | * | 478 | 403 | 0.0236% |
1967 | * | * | * | 429 | 478 | 0.0279% |
1966 | * | * | * | 409 | 514 | 0.0293% |
1965 | * | * | * | 408 | 519 | 0.0284% |
1964 | * | * | * | 406 | 577 | 0.0295% |
1963 | * | * | * | 385 | 624 | 0.0314% |
1962 | * | * | * | 367 | 656 | 0.0324% |
1961 | * | * | * | 362 | 702 | 0.0338% |
1960 | * | * | * | 356 | 738 | 0.0355% |
1959 | * | * | * | 329 | 822 | 0.0396% |
1958 | * | * | * | 335 | 791 | 0.0383% |
1957 | * | * | * | 313 | 868 | 0.0414% |
1956 | * | * | * | 289 | 932 | 0.0453% |
1955 | * | * | * | 281 | 940 | 0.0469% |
1954 | * | * | * | 253 | 1,054 | 0.0530% |
1953 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,016 | 0.0527% |
1952 | * | * | * | 242 | 1,065 | 0.0560% |
1951 | * | * | * | 238 | 1,066 | 0.0578% |
1950 | * | * | * | 217 | 1,194 | 0.0679% |
1949 | * | * | * | 208 | 1,287 | 0.0734% |
1948 | * | * | * | 205 | 1,302 | 0.0748% |
1947 | * | * | * | 196 | 1,359 | 0.0748% |
1946 | * | * | * | 185 | 1,382 | 0.0858% |
1945 | * | * | * | 173 | 1,228 | 0.0912% |
1944 | * | * | * | 166 | 1,327 | 0.0972% |
1943 | * | * | * | 162 | 1,477 | 0.1032% |
1942 | * | * | * | 153 | 1,625 | 0.1168% |
1941 | * | * | * | 148 | 1,601 | 0.1286% |
1940 | * | * | * | 142 | 1,697 | 0.1437% |
1939 | * | * | * | 146 | 1,584 | 0.1397% |
1938 | * | * | * | 141 | 1,727 | 0.1513% |
1937 | * | * | * | 133 | 1,779 | 0.1615% |
1936 | * | * | * | 130 | 1,793 | 0.1665% |
1935 | * | * | * | 120 | 1,920 | 0.1768% |
1934 | * | * | * | 116 | 1,981 | 0.1831% |
1933 | * | * | * | 109 | 2,060 | 0.1971% |
1932 | * | * | * | 105 | 2,313 | 0.2091% |
1931 | * | * | * | 100 | 2,412 | 0.2188% |
1930 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,640 | 0.2265% |
1929 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,683 | 0.2319% |
1928 | * | * | * | 87 | 2,989 | 0.2503% |
1927 | * | * | * | 84 | 3,201 | 0.2590% |
1926 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,272 | 0.2662% |
1925 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,499 | 0.2772% |
1924 | * | * | * | 70 | 3,856 | 0.2976% |
1923 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,881 | 0.3099% |
1922 | * | * | * | 65 | 3,985 | 0.3195% |
1921 | * | * | * | 67 | 4,131 | 0.3231% |
1920 | * | * | * | 66 | 4,094 | 0.3292% |
1919 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,165 | 0.3546% |
1918 | * | * | * | 58 | 4,445 | 0.3697% |
1917 | * | * | * | 56 | 4,245 | 0.3780% |
1916 | * | * | * | 54 | 4,356 | 0.4015% |
1915 | * | * | * | 54 | 4,121 | 0.4028% |
1914 | * | * | * | 49 | 3,552 | 0.4469% |
1913 | * | * | * | 49 | 2,910 | 0.4456% |
1912 | * | * | * | 45 | 2,736 | 0.4676% |
1911 | 907 | 14 | 0.0058% | 45 | 2,116 | 0.4804% |
1910 | * | * | * | 47 | 2,101 | 0.5020% |
1909 | 818 | 13 | 0.0074% | 44 | 1,941 | 0.5283% |
1908 | * | * | * | 44 | 1,948 | 0.5502% |
1907 | * | * | * | 38 | 1,980 | 0.5873% |
1906 | * | * | * | 43 | 1,751 | 0.5590% |
1905 | 769 | 11 | 0.0077% | 42 | 1,754 | 0.5662% |
1904 | * | * | * | 38 | 1,749 | 0.5981% |
1903 | * | * | * | 37 | 1,773 | 0.6374% |
1902 | * | * | * | 34 | 1,836 | 0.6550% |
1901 | 996 | 6 | 0.0052% | 34 | 1,835 | 0.7218% |
1900 | 716 | 13 | 0.0080% | 30 | 2,286 | 0.7187% |
1899 | 684 | 10 | 0.0087% | 31 | 1,805 | 0.7293% |
1898 | 846 | 8 | 0.0061% | 30 | 2,089 | 0.7620% |
1897 | * | * | * | 24 | 2,108 | 0.8491% |
1896 | * | * | * | 24 | 2,159 | 0.8567% |
1895 | 721 | 10 | 0.0079% | 23 | 2,170 | 0.8781% |
1894 | 764 | 9 | 0.0072% | 21 | 2,195 | 0.9301% |
1893 | 732 | 9 | 0.0074% | 18 | 2,247 | 0.9976% |
1892 | 714 | 10 | 0.0076% | 17 | 2,259 | 1.0043% |
1891 | * | * | * | 17 | 2,002 | 1.0184% |
1890 | 647 | 10 | 0.0084% | 16 | 2,178 | 1.0800% |
1889 | 752 | 8 | 0.0067% | 14 | 2,122 | 1.1214% |
1888 | 570 | 13 | 0.0100% | 12 | 2,229 | 1.1765% |
1887 | 655 | 9 | 0.0082% | 10 | 1,929 | 1.2410% |
1886 | 726 | 8 | 0.0067% | 7 | 2,049 | 1.3327% |
1885 | 879 | 6 | 0.0052% | 9 | 1,854 | 1.3060% |
1884 | 727 | 8 | 0.0065% | 7 | 1,882 | 1.3678% |
1883 | 966 | 5 | 0.0044% | 8 | 1,634 | 1.3608% |
1882 | * | * | * | 7 | 1,673 | 1.4459% |
1881 | 940 | 5 | 0.0046% | 7 | 1,439 | 1.4554% |
1880 | 712 | 8 | 0.0068% | 7 | 1,472 | 1.5079% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |