Humberto: Statistics About The Baby Name Humberto
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2010 | 893 | 229 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
2009 | 903 | 228 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
2008 | 805 | 268 | 0.0125% | * | * | * |
2007 | 761 | 284 | 0.0130% | * | * | * |
2006 | 697 | 310 | 0.0144% | * | * | * |
2005 | 691 | 293 | 0.0140% | * | * | * |
2004 | 679 | 292 | 0.0140% | * | * | * |
2003 | 623 | 328 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
2002 | 593 | 347 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
2001 | 563 | 368 | 0.0179% | * | * | * |
2000 | 574 | 352 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
1999 | 556 | 360 | 0.0177% | * | * | * |
1998 | 576 | 339 | 0.0168% | * | * | * |
1997 | 531 | 376 | 0.0189% | * | * | * |
1996 | 543 | 354 | 0.0177% | * | * | * |
1995 | 531 | 364 | 0.0181% | * | * | * |
1994 | 537 | 361 | 0.0177% | * | * | * |
1993 | 523 | 377 | 0.0183% | * | * | * |
1992 | 521 | 378 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
1991 | 523 | 366 | 0.0173% | * | * | * |
1990 | 511 | 374 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1989 | 585 | 278 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1988 | 557 | 272 | 0.0136% | * | * | * |
1987 | 536 | 285 | 0.0146% | * | * | * |
1986 | 557 | 254 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
1985 | 571 | 237 | 0.0123% | * | * | * |
1984 | 562 | 232 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
1983 | 582 | 211 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
1982 | 558 | 236 | 0.0125% | * | * | * |
1981 | 579 | 218 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
1980 | 517 | 270 | 0.0146% | * | * | * |
1979 | 593 | 208 | 0.0116% | * | * | * |
1978 | 597 | 196 | 0.0115% | * | * | * |
1977 | 569 | 217 | 0.0127% | * | * | * |
1976 | 583 | 197 | 0.0121% | * | * | * |
1975 | 580 | 194 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
1974 | 574 | 196 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
1973 | 581 | 186 | 0.0115% | * | * | * |
1972 | 656 | 149 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
1971 | 669 | 153 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
1970 | 653 | 157 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1969 | 676 | 135 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
1968 | 646 | 137 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1967 | 698 | 113 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
1966 | 681 | 120 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1965 | 704 | 111 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1964 | 695 | 124 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1963 | 727 | 116 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1962 | 721 | 114 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1961 | 701 | 119 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1960 | 700 | 126 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1959 | 681 | 125 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1958 | 699 | 114 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1957 | 671 | 129 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1956 | 777 | 91 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
1955 | 691 | 113 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1954 | 893 | 69 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
1953 | 733 | 95 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1952 | 724 | 94 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1951 | 745 | 87 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1950 | 743 | 85 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1949 | 745 | 85 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1948 | 759 | 79 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1947 | 668 | 106 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1946 | 736 | 79 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1945 | 793 | 61 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1944 | 700 | 79 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1942 | 788 | 67 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1941 | 997 | 42 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1940 | 918 | 48 | 0.0040% | * | * | * |
1939 | 825 | 55 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1938 | 773 | 63 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1936 | 931 | 44 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1934 | 945 | 45 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
1933 | 942 | 45 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1932 | 908 | 51 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1931 | 812 | 60 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1930 | 898 | 55 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1929 | 840 | 61 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |