
Hazel: Statistics About The Baby Name Hazel
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 19 | 6,401 | 0.3622% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 19 | 6,154 | 0.3518% |
| 2022 | * | * | * | 27 | 6,125 | 0.3432% |
| 2021 | * | * | * | 28 | 5,967 | 0.3353% |
| 2020 | * | * | * | 31 | 5,490 | 0.3115% |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 33 | 5,431 | 0.2979% |
| 2018 | * | * | * | 42 | 4,916 | 0.2663% |
| 2017 | * | * | * | 43 | 5,004 | 0.2669% |
| 2016 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,663 | 0.2418% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,270 | 0.2207% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,877 | 0.1484% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 157 | 2,039 | 0.1068% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 175 | 1,768 | 0.0920% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 211 | 1,468 | 0.0764% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 262 | 1,232 | 0.0635% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 294 | 1,107 | 0.0553% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 343 | 955 | 0.0465% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 361 | 886 | 0.0425% |
| 2006 | * | * | * | 465 | 671 | 0.0326% |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 514 | 565 | 0.0284% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 676 | 399 | 0.0201% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 681 | 384 | 0.0193% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 768 | 311 | 0.0158% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 750 | 319 | 0.0162% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 892 | 246 | 0.0124% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 914 | 231 | 0.0119% |
| 1998 | * | * | * | 939 | 219 | 0.0113% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 945 | 134 | 0.0086% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 925 | 136 | 0.0087% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 888 | 142 | 0.0091% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 803 | 169 | 0.0105% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 788 | 184 | 0.0105% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 683 | 232 | 0.0127% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 687 | 210 | 0.0119% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 617 | 242 | 0.0142% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 595 | 256 | 0.0149% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 543 | 300 | 0.0171% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 515 | 343 | 0.0188% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 512 | 363 | 0.0186% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 472 | 421 | 0.0212% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 457 | 448 | 0.0221% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 433 | 515 | 0.0248% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 397 | 577 | 0.0277% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 391 | 584 | 0.0281% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 361 | 654 | 0.0317% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 333 | 747 | 0.0356% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 315 | 773 | 0.0375% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 287 | 908 | 0.0453% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 258 | 1,031 | 0.0518% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 251 | 1,051 | 0.0545% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 244 | 1,053 | 0.0554% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 225 | 1,148 | 0.0623% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 219 | 1,183 | 0.0673% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 206 | 1,312 | 0.0748% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 200 | 1,350 | 0.0775% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 183 | 1,555 | 0.0856% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,526 | 0.0948% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 165 | 1,429 | 0.1062% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 147 | 1,658 | 0.1215% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 144 | 1,861 | 0.1300% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 139 | 1,911 | 0.1373% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 131 | 1,979 | 0.1590% |
| 1940 | 953 | 45 | 0.0038% | 123 | 2,059 | 0.1743% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 118 | 2,095 | 0.1847% |
| 1938 | 922 | 47 | 0.0041% | 111 | 2,342 | 0.2052% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 106 | 2,352 | 0.2136% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,511 | 0.2331% |
| 1935 | 841 | 55 | 0.0051% | 92 | 2,692 | 0.2478% |
| 1934 | 958 | 44 | 0.0041% | 87 | 2,805 | 0.2593% |
| 1933 | 914 | 47 | 0.0046% | 82 | 3,022 | 0.2891% |
| 1932 | 894 | 52 | 0.0048% | 75 | 3,345 | 0.3025% |
| 1931 | 842 | 56 | 0.0052% | 74 | 3,493 | 0.3169% |
| 1930 | 924 | 53 | 0.0047% | 71 | 3,885 | 0.3334% |
| 1929 | 796 | 66 | 0.0060% | 64 | 4,167 | 0.3602% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,646 | 0.3890% |
| 1927 | 981 | 51 | 0.0044% | 53 | 5,088 | 0.4117% |
| 1926 | 859 | 60 | 0.0052% | 48 | 5,300 | 0.4312% |
| 1925 | 874 | 59 | 0.0051% | 45 | 5,771 | 0.4571% |
| 1924 | 815 | 69 | 0.0059% | 42 | 6,342 | 0.4894% |
| 1923 | 829 | 67 | 0.0059% | 40 | 6,236 | 0.4980% |
| 1922 | 813 | 69 | 0.0061% | 37 | 6,763 | 0.5423% |
| 1921 | 779 | 74 | 0.0065% | 34 | 7,330 | 0.5733% |
| 1920 | 740 | 78 | 0.0071% | 34 | 7,302 | 0.5872% |
| 1919 | 703 | 80 | 0.0079% | 32 | 7,430 | 0.6326% |
| 1918 | 823 | 64 | 0.0061% | 33 | 7,613 | 0.6331% |
| 1917 | 743 | 71 | 0.0074% | 31 | 7,289 | 0.6490% |
| 1916 | 665 | 79 | 0.0086% | 31 | 7,205 | 0.6641% |
| 1915 | 719 | 68 | 0.0077% | 26 | 7,086 | 0.6926% |
| 1914 | 649 | 61 | 0.0089% | 29 | 5,308 | 0.6679% |
| 1913 | 765 | 38 | 0.0071% | 27 | 4,572 | 0.7001% |
| 1912 | 600 | 46 | 0.0102% | 25 | 4,183 | 0.7149% |
| 1911 | 589 | 27 | 0.0112% | 25 | 3,277 | 0.7440% |
| 1910 | 541 | 28 | 0.0135% | 24 | 3,024 | 0.7225% |
| 1909 | 524 | 25 | 0.0142% | 24 | 2,701 | 0.7352% |
| 1908 | 458 | 29 | 0.0174% | 24 | 2,695 | 0.7612% |
| 1907 | 570 | 19 | 0.0120% | 23 | 2,525 | 0.7489% |
| 1906 | 780 | 11 | 0.0076% | 23 | 2,316 | 0.7394% |
| 1905 | 602 | 16 | 0.0112% | 25 | 2,351 | 0.7589% |
| 1904 | 437 | 24 | 0.0173% | 23 | 2,300 | 0.7866% |
| 1903 | 561 | 16 | 0.0124% | 26 | 2,140 | 0.7694% |
| 1902 | 567 | 15 | 0.0113% | 25 | 2,238 | 0.7984% |
| 1901 | 442 | 19 | 0.0164% | 23 | 2,097 | 0.8248% |
| 1900 | 660 | 15 | 0.0092% | 29 | 2,426 | 0.7627% |
| 1899 | 594 | 12 | 0.0104% | 26 | 2,033 | 0.8214% |
| 1898 | 646 | 12 | 0.0091% | 19 | 2,439 | 0.8896% |
| 1897 | 529 | 15 | 0.0123% | 18 | 2,339 | 0.9421% |
| 1896 | 694 | 11 | 0.0085% | 22 | 2,226 | 0.8833% |
| 1895 | 587 | 13 | 0.0103% | 22 | 2,252 | 0.9113% |
| 1894 | 696 | 10 | 0.0080% | 23 | 2,103 | 0.8911% |
| 1893 | 554 | 13 | 0.0107% | 22 | 2,052 | 0.9110% |
| 1892 | 619 | 12 | 0.0091% | 25 | 1,897 | 0.8434% |
| 1891 | 507 | 13 | 0.0119% | 32 | 1,447 | 0.7361% |
| 1890 | 779 | 8 | 0.0067% | 37 | 1,366 | 0.6773% |
| 1889 | 744 | 8 | 0.0067% | 48 | 1,056 | 0.5580% |
| 1888 | 567 | 13 | 0.0100% | 55 | 898 | 0.4740% |
| 1887 | 991 | 5 | 0.0046% | 72 | 504 | 0.3242% |
| 1886 | 897 | 6 | 0.0050% | 81 | 429 | 0.2790% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 105 | 281 | 0.1979% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 122 | 209 | 0.1519% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 149 | 123 | 0.1024% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 191 | 73 | 0.0631% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 217 | 50 | 0.0506% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 356 | 21 | 0.0215% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
