
Graciela: Statistics About The Baby Name Graciela
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 979 | 270 | 0.0130% | 
| 2005 | * | * | * | 905 | 273 | 0.0137% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 863 | 280 | 0.0141% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 873 | 274 | 0.0137% | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 923 | 241 | 0.0123% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 833 | 275 | 0.0139% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 814 | 277 | 0.0139% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 731 | 307 | 0.0158% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 574 | 426 | 0.0220% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 744 | 287 | 0.0151% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 770 | 274 | 0.0143% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 723 | 283 | 0.0147% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 802 | 252 | 0.0129% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 881 | 219 | 0.0111% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 897 | 219 | 0.0109% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 905 | 215 | 0.0106% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 979 | 190 | 0.0093% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 910 | 199 | 0.0100% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 988 | 159 | 0.0085% | 
| 1985 | * | * | * | 888 | 180 | 0.0098% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 892 | 167 | 0.0093% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 814 | 189 | 0.0106% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 873 | 176 | 0.0097% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 838 | 186 | 0.0104% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 710 | 238 | 0.0134% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 715 | 236 | 0.0137% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 742 | 209 | 0.0127% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 732 | 210 | 0.0128% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 666 | 229 | 0.0146% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 708 | 209 | 0.0134% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 636 | 240 | 0.0153% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 647 | 231 | 0.0149% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 741 | 188 | 0.0117% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 758 | 193 | 0.0110% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 690 | 227 | 0.0124% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 678 | 215 | 0.0122% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 678 | 205 | 0.0120% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 663 | 211 | 0.0123% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 643 | 222 | 0.0127% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 690 | 202 | 0.0111% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 703 | 217 | 0.0111% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 747 | 190 | 0.0096% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 757 | 188 | 0.0093% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 677 | 234 | 0.0113% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 777 | 173 | 0.0083% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 669 | 224 | 0.0108% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 743 | 180 | 0.0087% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 702 | 201 | 0.0096% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 698 | 189 | 0.0092% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 755 | 158 | 0.0079% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 709 | 169 | 0.0085% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 654 | 189 | 0.0098% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 692 | 166 | 0.0087% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 706 | 153 | 0.0083% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 786 | 122 | 0.0069% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 732 | 135 | 0.0077% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 763 | 125 | 0.0072% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 898 | 97 | 0.0053% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 888 | 88 | 0.0055% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 877 | 74 | 0.0055% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 930 | 69 | 0.0051% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
