George: Statistics About The Baby Name George
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 136 | 2,689 | 0.1468% | * | * | * |
2022 | 142 | 2,620 | 0.1406% | * | * | * |
2021 | 134 | 2,774 | 0.1491% | * | * | * |
2020 | 134 | 2,761 | 0.1497% | * | * | * |
2019 | 119 | 3,175 | 0.1663% | * | * | * |
2018 | 127 | 3,059 | 0.1586% | * | * | * |
2017 | 124 | 3,151 | 0.1605% | * | * | * |
2016 | 125 | 3,299 | 0.1635% | * | * | * |
2015 | 136 | 3,032 | 0.1496% | * | * | * |
2014 | 134 | 2,988 | 0.1472% | * | * | * |
2013 | 157 | 2,522 | 0.1261% | * | * | * |
2012 | 166 | 2,320 | 0.1154% | * | * | * |
2011 | 165 | 2,296 | 0.1141% | * | * | * |
2010 | 164 | 2,344 | 0.1153% | * | * | * |
2009 | 163 | 2,352 | 0.1122% | * | * | * |
2008 | 153 | 2,526 | 0.1174% | * | * | * |
2007 | 147 | 2,719 | 0.1247% | * | * | * |
2006 | 153 | 2,662 | 0.1235% | * | * | * |
2005 | 139 | 2,766 | 0.1325% | * | * | * |
2004 | 148 | 2,690 | 0.1293% | * | * | * |
2003 | 138 | 2,901 | 0.1389% | * | * | * |
2002 | 131 | 2,994 | 0.1455% | * | * | * |
2001 | 129 | 3,073 | 0.1491% | * | * | * |
2000 | 130 | 3,030 | 0.1455% | * | * | * |
1999 | 123 | 3,038 | 0.1493% | * | * | * |
1998 | 126 | 3,039 | 0.1502% | * | * | * |
1997 | 121 | 3,175 | 0.1592% | * | * | * |
1996 | 118 | 3,225 | 0.1612% | * | * | * |
1995 | 115 | 3,284 | 0.1635% | * | * | * |
1994 | 110 | 3,317 | 0.1630% | * | * | * |
1993 | 104 | 3,506 | 0.1700% | * | * | * |
1992 | 95 | 3,890 | 0.1856% | * | * | * |
1991 | 87 | 4,174 | 0.1972% | * | * | * |
1990 | 79 | 4,562 | 0.2123% | * | * | * |
1989 | 79 | 4,506 | 0.2153% | * | * | * |
1988 | 78 | 4,283 | 0.2145% | * | * | * |
1987 | 76 | 4,087 | 0.2099% | * | * | * |
1986 | 74 | 4,341 | 0.2264% | * | * | * |
1985 | 72 | 4,249 | 0.2212% | * | * | * |
1984 | 68 | 4,248 | 0.2268% | * | * | * |
1983 | 65 | 4,480 | 0.2409% | * | * | * |
1982 | 63 | 4,979 | 0.2644% | * | * | * |
1981 | 61 | 5,146 | 0.2769% | * | * | * |
1980 | 60 | 5,287 | 0.2857% | * | * | * |
1979 | 57 | 5,241 | 0.2931% | * | * | * |
1978 | 58 | 5,278 | 0.3096% | * | * | * |
1977 | 57 | 5,584 | 0.3273% | * | * | * |
1976 | 53 | 5,542 | 0.3400% | * | * | * |
1975 | 53 | 5,824 | 0.3596% | * | * | * |
1974 | 49 | 6,273 | 0.3854% | * | * | * |
1973 | 47 | 6,585 | 0.4087% | * | * | * |
1972 | 44 | 7,151 | 0.4277% | * | * | * |
1971 | 42 | 8,212 | 0.4526% | * | * | * |
1970 | 40 | 8,909 | 0.4684% | * | * | * |
1969 | 38 | 9,198 | 0.5031% | * | * | * |
1968 | 36 | 9,380 | 0.5286% | * | * | * |
1967 | 36 | 9,694 | 0.5452% | * | * | * |
1966 | 37 | 9,925 | 0.5465% | * | * | * |
1965 | 34 | 10,687 | 0.5642% | * | * | * |
1964 | 33 | 11,793 | 0.5822% | * | * | * |
1963 | 34 | 12,083 | 0.5854% | * | * | * |
1962 | 32 | 12,550 | 0.5975% | * | * | * |
1961 | 31 | 13,599 | 0.6318% | * | * | * |
1960 | 33 | 14,051 | 0.6491% | * | * | * |
1959 | 32 | 15,002 | 0.6930% | * | * | * |
1958 | 31 | 15,613 | 0.7262% | * | * | * |
1957 | 29 | 16,852 | 0.7712% | * | * | * |
1956 | 27 | 17,198 | 0.8029% | * | * | * |
1955 | 26 | 18,138 | 0.8694% | 955 | 107 | 0.0053% |
1954 | 24 | 18,665 | 0.9033% | 947 | 104 | 0.0052% |
1953 | 22 | 19,139 | 0.9585% | 935 | 102 | 0.0053% |
1952 | 22 | 19,771 | 1.0021% | 895 | 107 | 0.0056% |
1951 | 22 | 20,120 | 1.0570% | 857 | 109 | 0.0059% |
1950 | 20 | 20,163 | 1.1089% | 824 | 112 | 0.0064% |
1949 | 18 | 21,274 | 1.1843% | 847 | 109 | 0.0062% |
1948 | 16 | 21,843 | 1.2287% | 747 | 130 | 0.0075% |
1947 | 16 | 23,843 | 1.2877% | 791 | 120 | 0.0066% |
1946 | 16 | 21,475 | 1.3064% | 744 | 120 | 0.0075% |
1945 | 15 | 19,297 | 1.4089% | 652 | 127 | 0.0094% |
1944 | 14 | 20,353 | 1.4702% | 646 | 131 | 0.0096% |
1943 | 14 | 21,576 | 1.4906% | 617 | 149 | 0.0104% |
1942 | 14 | 21,261 | 1.5092% | 611 | 150 | 0.0108% |
1941 | 13 | 19,256 | 1.5373% | 664 | 114 | 0.0092% |
1940 | 11 | 18,297 | 1.5428% | 622 | 127 | 0.0108% |
1939 | 11 | 17,896 | 1.5785% | 562 | 143 | 0.0126% |
1938 | 11 | 18,424 | 1.6224% | 580 | 140 | 0.0123% |
1937 | 10 | 18,402 | 1.6848% | 566 | 145 | 0.0132% |
1936 | 9 | 18,184 | 1.7105% | 588 | 127 | 0.0118% |
1935 | 8 | 18,530 | 1.7349% | 515 | 155 | 0.0143% |
1934 | 8 | 18,460 | 1.7407% | 509 | 159 | 0.0147% |
1933 | 8 | 18,320 | 1.7994% | 528 | 145 | 0.0139% |
1932 | 8 | 20,397 | 1.9014% | 501 | 175 | 0.0158% |
1931 | 8 | 20,629 | 1.9334% | 492 | 171 | 0.0155% |
1930 | 8 | 22,740 | 2.0174% | 429 | 242 | 0.0208% |
1929 | 8 | 23,028 | 2.0829% | 470 | 202 | 0.0175% |
1928 | 8 | 24,311 | 2.1337% | 455 | 227 | 0.0190% |
1927 | 7 | 25,936 | 2.2361% | 433 | 251 | 0.0203% |
1926 | 6 | 25,862 | 2.2603% | 446 | 229 | 0.0186% |
1925 | 6 | 26,540 | 2.3078% | 486 | 207 | 0.0164% |
1924 | 6 | 27,353 | 2.3411% | 505 | 196 | 0.0151% |
1923 | 6 | 27,013 | 2.3855% | 532 | 178 | 0.0142% |
1922 | 6 | 27,356 | 2.4302% | 490 | 198 | 0.0159% |
1921 | 6 | 27,461 | 2.4147% | 484 | 203 | 0.0159% |
1920 | 6 | 26,878 | 2.4419% | 554 | 167 | 0.0134% |
1919 | 6 | 25,165 | 2.4772% | 534 | 164 | 0.0140% |
1918 | 6 | 26,357 | 2.5098% | 570 | 157 | 0.0131% |
1917 | 6 | 24,191 | 2.5217% | 572 | 139 | 0.0124% |
1916 | 7 | 23,386 | 2.5324% | 578 | 135 | 0.0124% |
1915 | 6 | 22,324 | 2.5329% | 535 | 140 | 0.0137% |
1914 | 6 | 17,601 | 2.5771% | 543 | 107 | 0.0135% |
1913 | 6 | 13,863 | 2.5879% | 584 | 77 | 0.0118% |
1912 | 6 | 11,722 | 2.5992% | 579 | 70 | 0.0120% |
1911 | 4 | 6,576 | 2.7302% | 595 | 51 | 0.0116% |
1910 | 5 | 5,425 | 2.6060% | 539 | 57 | 0.0136% |
1909 | 4 | 4,688 | 2.6545% | 652 | 37 | 0.0101% |
1908 | 4 | 4,577 | 2.7528% | 579 | 42 | 0.0119% |
1907 | 4 | 4,442 | 2.8023% | 546 | 44 | 0.0131% |
1906 | 4 | 4,200 | 2.9156% | 654 | 31 | 0.0099% |
1905 | 4 | 4,254 | 2.9694% | 625 | 32 | 0.0103% |
1904 | 4 | 4,219 | 3.0460% | 689 | 26 | 0.0089% |
1903 | 4 | 3,960 | 3.0613% | 644 | 27 | 0.0097% |
1902 | 4 | 4,226 | 3.1827% | 584 | 32 | 0.0114% |
1901 | 4 | 3,609 | 3.1210% | 607 | 27 | 0.0106% |
1900 | 4 | 5,413 | 3.3301% | 545 | 39 | 0.0123% |
1899 | 4 | 4,019 | 3.4881% | 519 | 33 | 0.0133% |
1898 | 4 | 4,855 | 3.6738% | 433 | 51 | 0.0186% |
1897 | 4 | 4,077 | 3.3423% | 600 | 26 | 0.0105% |
1896 | 4 | 4,286 | 3.3197% | 528 | 32 | 0.0127% |
1895 | 4 | 4,289 | 3.3858% | 418 | 46 | 0.0186% |
1894 | 4 | 4,366 | 3.4950% | 508 | 32 | 0.0136% |
1893 | 4 | 4,321 | 3.5689% | 565 | 25 | 0.0111% |
1892 | 4 | 4,760 | 3.6204% | 423 | 40 | 0.0178% |
1891 | 4 | 3,931 | 3.5972% | 548 | 23 | 0.0117% |
1890 | 4 | 4,458 | 3.7238% | 417 | 37 | 0.0183% |
1889 | 4 | 4,432 | 3.7224% | 375 | 42 | 0.0222% |
1888 | 4 | 4,912 | 3.7807% | 416 | 36 | 0.0190% |
1887 | 4 | 4,284 | 3.9186% | 369 | 34 | 0.0219% |
1886 | 4 | 4,670 | 3.9226% | 349 | 38 | 0.0247% |
1885 | 4 | 4,673 | 4.0301% | 384 | 29 | 0.0204% |
1884 | 4 | 4,961 | 4.0416% | 307 | 40 | 0.0291% |
1883 | 5 | 4,736 | 4.2100% | 402 | 22 | 0.0183% |
1882 | 4 | 5,194 | 4.2556% | 314 | 32 | 0.0277% |
1881 | 4 | 4,663 | 4.3052% | 286 | 30 | 0.0303% |
1880 | 5 | 5,126 | 4.3286% | 312 | 26 | 0.0266% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |