Garnett: Statistics About The Baby Name Garnett
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1950 | 962 | 52 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1948 | 928 | 55 | 0.0031% | * | * | * |
1947 | 871 | 64 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1946 | 947 | 50 | 0.0030% | * | * | * |
1944 | 859 | 54 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1943 | 949 | 50 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1942 | 963 | 48 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1941 | 936 | 47 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1940 | 842 | 56 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1939 | 876 | 50 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1938 | 840 | 55 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1937 | * | * | * | 998 | 50 | 0.0045% |
1936 | 812 | 57 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1935 | 719 | 72 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1934 | 976 | 43 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1933 | 815 | 58 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1932 | 783 | 66 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1931 | 903 | 51 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1930 | 858 | 59 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1929 | 927 | 53 | 0.0048% | 886 | 65 | 0.0056% |
1928 | 866 | 59 | 0.0052% | 918 | 65 | 0.0054% |
1927 | 781 | 71 | 0.0061% | 937 | 64 | 0.0052% |
1926 | 769 | 71 | 0.0062% | 958 | 61 | 0.0050% |
1925 | 738 | 78 | 0.0068% | 847 | 77 | 0.0061% |
1924 | 827 | 67 | 0.0057% | 979 | 61 | 0.0047% |
1923 | 714 | 83 | 0.0073% | 805 | 82 | 0.0065% |
1922 | 733 | 81 | 0.0072% | 787 | 86 | 0.0069% |
1921 | 739 | 80 | 0.0070% | 826 | 80 | 0.0063% |
1920 | 699 | 86 | 0.0078% | 726 | 99 | 0.0080% |
1919 | 731 | 76 | 0.0075% | 838 | 69 | 0.0059% |
1918 | 745 | 75 | 0.0071% | 761 | 88 | 0.0073% |
1917 | 746 | 70 | 0.0073% | 847 | 66 | 0.0059% |
1916 | 747 | 67 | 0.0073% | 739 | 84 | 0.0077% |
1915 | 677 | 74 | 0.0084% | 697 | 91 | 0.0089% |
1914 | 590 | 73 | 0.0107% | 764 | 57 | 0.0072% |
1913 | 809 | 35 | 0.0065% | 767 | 47 | 0.0072% |
1912 | 708 | 37 | 0.0082% | 716 | 49 | 0.0084% |
1911 | 739 | 19 | 0.0079% | 705 | 38 | 0.0086% |
1910 | 798 | 15 | 0.0072% | 694 | 38 | 0.0091% |
1909 | 523 | 25 | 0.0142% | 916 | 20 | 0.0054% |
1908 | 852 | 11 | 0.0066% | 892 | 20 | 0.0056% |
1907 | 602 | 18 | 0.0114% | 730 | 27 | 0.0080% |
1906 | 723 | 12 | 0.0083% | 854 | 19 | 0.0061% |
1905 | 678 | 13 | 0.0091% | 748 | 24 | 0.0077% |
1904 | 778 | 10 | 0.0072% | 646 | 29 | 0.0099% |
1903 | 533 | 17 | 0.0131% | 797 | 19 | 0.0068% |
1902 | * | * | * | 722 | 23 | 0.0082% |
1901 | * | * | * | 806 | 17 | 0.0067% |
1900 | 869 | 10 | 0.0062% | 815 | 21 | 0.0066% |
1899 | 739 | 9 | 0.0078% | 852 | 15 | 0.0061% |
1898 | 773 | 9 | 0.0068% | 684 | 23 | 0.0084% |
1897 | 818 | 8 | 0.0066% | 945 | 12 | 0.0048% |
1896 | 796 | 9 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1895 | 824 | 8 | 0.0063% | 907 | 13 | 0.0053% |
1894 | 896 | 7 | 0.0056% | 821 | 14 | 0.0059% |
1893 | 863 | 7 | 0.0058% | 920 | 11 | 0.0049% |
1892 | 822 | 8 | 0.0061% | 928 | 11 | 0.0049% |
1891 | 726 | 8 | 0.0073% | 964 | 9 | 0.0046% |
1890 | 837 | 7 | 0.0058% | 844 | 11 | 0.0055% |
1889 | * | * | * | 769 | 12 | 0.0063% |
1888 | 965 | 6 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1886 | 792 | 7 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1885 | 872 | 6 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1882 | 557 | 12 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
1881 | 924 | 5 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |