
Garnet: Statistics About The Baby Name Garnet
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 955 | 66 | 0.0048% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 884 | 78 | 0.0054% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 725 | 107 | 0.0077% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 858 | 72 | 0.0058% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 722 | 93 | 0.0079% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 829 | 70 | 0.0062% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 712 | 93 | 0.0082% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 667 | 104 | 0.0094% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 769 | 77 | 0.0071% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 681 | 96 | 0.0088% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 706 | 89 | 0.0082% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 616 | 111 | 0.0106% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 673 | 101 | 0.0091% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 636 | 109 | 0.0099% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 667 | 106 | 0.0091% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 575 | 142 | 0.0123% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 647 | 118 | 0.0099% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 610 | 137 | 0.0111% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 606 | 137 | 0.0111% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 579 | 155 | 0.0123% |
| 1924 | 958 | 54 | 0.0046% | 569 | 165 | 0.0127% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 512 | 187 | 0.0149% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 558 | 164 | 0.0131% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 491 | 201 | 0.0157% |
| 1920 | 931 | 55 | 0.0050% | 418 | 252 | 0.0203% |
| 1919 | 919 | 53 | 0.0052% | 444 | 220 | 0.0187% |
| 1918 | 966 | 48 | 0.0046% | 407 | 258 | 0.0215% |
| 1917 | 876 | 53 | 0.0055% | 417 | 232 | 0.0207% |
| 1916 | 977 | 43 | 0.0047% | 436 | 210 | 0.0194% |
| 1915 | 886 | 49 | 0.0056% | 443 | 192 | 0.0188% |
| 1914 | 971 | 33 | 0.0048% | 428 | 158 | 0.0199% |
| 1913 | 888 | 31 | 0.0058% | 427 | 133 | 0.0204% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 467 | 104 | 0.0178% |
| 1911 | 999 | 12 | 0.0050% | 376 | 116 | 0.0263% |
| 1910 | 891 | 13 | 0.0062% | 465 | 74 | 0.0177% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 408 | 80 | 0.0218% |
| 1908 | 796 | 12 | 0.0072% | 431 | 70 | 0.0198% |
| 1907 | 955 | 9 | 0.0057% | 405 | 77 | 0.0228% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 418 | 67 | 0.0214% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 482 | 50 | 0.0161% |
| 1904 | 593 | 15 | 0.0108% | 503 | 43 | 0.0147% |
| 1903 | 867 | 8 | 0.0062% | 485 | 44 | 0.0158% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 529 | 37 | 0.0132% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 444 | 45 | 0.0177% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 664 | 29 | 0.0091% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 529 | 32 | 0.0129% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 533 | 35 | 0.0128% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 492 | 35 | 0.0141% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 569 | 29 | 0.0115% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 667 | 22 | 0.0089% |
| 1894 | 895 | 7 | 0.0056% | 634 | 22 | 0.0093% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 617 | 22 | 0.0098% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 740 | 16 | 0.0071% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 678 | 16 | 0.0081% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 704 | 15 | 0.0074% |
| 1889 | 835 | 7 | 0.0059% | 822 | 11 | 0.0058% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 758 | 10 | 0.0064% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 815 | 8 | 0.0056% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 881 | 7 | 0.0051% |
| 1882 | 994 | 5 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
