Garfield: Statistics About The Baby Name Garfield
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1953 | 862 | 69 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1952 | 833 | 71 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1950 | 813 | 70 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1949 | 843 | 66 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1948 | 871 | 61 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1946 | 845 | 61 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1945 | 808 | 59 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1944 | 775 | 65 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1942 | 826 | 62 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1941 | 739 | 70 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1940 | 682 | 79 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1939 | 740 | 66 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1938 | 772 | 63 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1937 | 830 | 54 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1936 | 887 | 48 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1935 | 869 | 52 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1934 | 793 | 61 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1933 | 841 | 54 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1932 | 748 | 70 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1931 | 750 | 68 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
1930 | 744 | 73 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1929 | 721 | 75 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1928 | 737 | 76 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1927 | 637 | 98 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
1926 | 693 | 83 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1925 | 655 | 95 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1924 | 673 | 93 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1923 | 651 | 98 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1922 | 621 | 108 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1921 | 643 | 100 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
1920 | 624 | 103 | 0.0094% | * | * | * |
1919 | 568 | 111 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
1918 | 559 | 117 | 0.0111% | * | * | * |
1917 | 586 | 103 | 0.0107% | * | * | * |
1916 | 591 | 97 | 0.0105% | * | * | * |
1915 | 556 | 103 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
1914 | 549 | 81 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
1913 | 517 | 69 | 0.0129% | * | * | * |
1912 | 525 | 57 | 0.0126% | * | * | * |
1911 | 472 | 38 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
1910 | 407 | 43 | 0.0207% | * | * | * |
1909 | 422 | 35 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
1908 | 455 | 29 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1907 | 368 | 37 | 0.0233% | * | * | * |
1906 | 390 | 31 | 0.0215% | * | * | * |
1905 | 470 | 23 | 0.0161% | * | * | * |
1904 | 362 | 31 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
1903 | 493 | 19 | 0.0147% | * | * | * |
1902 | 396 | 26 | 0.0196% | * | * | * |
1901 | 384 | 24 | 0.0208% | * | * | * |
1900 | 397 | 32 | 0.0197% | * | * | * |
1899 | 428 | 19 | 0.0165% | * | * | * |
1898 | 423 | 22 | 0.0166% | * | * | * |
1897 | 462 | 18 | 0.0148% | * | * | * |
1896 | 448 | 20 | 0.0155% | * | * | * |
1895 | 537 | 15 | 0.0118% | * | * | * |
1894 | 426 | 20 | 0.0160% | * | * | * |
1893 | 587 | 12 | 0.0099% | * | * | * |
1892 | 377 | 26 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
1891 | 360 | 23 | 0.0210% | * | * | * |
1890 | 331 | 28 | 0.0234% | * | * | * |
1889 | 328 | 29 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
1888 | 326 | 31 | 0.0239% | * | * | * |
1887 | 328 | 26 | 0.0238% | * | * | * |
1886 | 277 | 38 | 0.0319% | * | * | * |
1885 | 286 | 34 | 0.0293% | * | * | * |
1884 | 320 | 30 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
1883 | 222 | 49 | 0.0436% | * | * | * |
1882 | 190 | 69 | 0.0565% | * | * | * |
1881 | 89 | 146 | 0.1348% | * | * | * |
1880 | 111 | 122 | 0.1030% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |