
Fay: Statistics About The Baby Name Fay
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 991 | 111 | 0.0065% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 967 | 112 | 0.0065% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 843 | 140 | 0.0080% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 792 | 155 | 0.0085% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 766 | 184 | 0.0094% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 693 | 212 | 0.0107% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 684 | 226 | 0.0112% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 656 | 243 | 0.0117% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 599 | 275 | 0.0132% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 614 | 260 | 0.0125% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 564 | 301 | 0.0146% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 600 | 264 | 0.0126% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 519 | 327 | 0.0159% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 560 | 263 | 0.0131% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 496 | 320 | 0.0161% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 501 | 301 | 0.0156% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 472 | 319 | 0.0168% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 422 | 391 | 0.0212% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 409 | 380 | 0.0216% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 398 | 403 | 0.0230% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 421 | 351 | 0.0202% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 387 | 420 | 0.0231% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 375 | 411 | 0.0255% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 384 | 334 | 0.0248% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 349 | 389 | 0.0285% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 324 | 472 | 0.0330% |
| 1942 | 951 | 49 | 0.0035% | 309 | 490 | 0.0352% |
| 1941 | 982 | 43 | 0.0034% | 319 | 429 | 0.0345% |
| 1940 | 815 | 59 | 0.0050% | 280 | 498 | 0.0422% |
| 1939 | 986 | 42 | 0.0037% | 278 | 501 | 0.0442% |
| 1938 | 857 | 53 | 0.0047% | 282 | 498 | 0.0436% |
| 1937 | 899 | 48 | 0.0044% | 268 | 547 | 0.0497% |
| 1936 | 793 | 60 | 0.0056% | 262 | 531 | 0.0493% |
| 1935 | 725 | 71 | 0.0066% | 262 | 542 | 0.0499% |
| 1934 | 667 | 83 | 0.0078% | 246 | 635 | 0.0587% |
| 1933 | 663 | 78 | 0.0077% | 248 | 604 | 0.0578% |
| 1932 | 757 | 69 | 0.0064% | 239 | 658 | 0.0595% |
| 1931 | 657 | 83 | 0.0078% | 238 | 630 | 0.0571% |
| 1930 | 684 | 84 | 0.0075% | 250 | 613 | 0.0526% |
| 1929 | 688 | 80 | 0.0072% | 244 | 653 | 0.0564% |
| 1928 | 669 | 89 | 0.0078% | 258 | 626 | 0.0524% |
| 1927 | 641 | 97 | 0.0084% | 254 | 665 | 0.0538% |
| 1926 | 602 | 110 | 0.0096% | 244 | 718 | 0.0584% |
| 1925 | 576 | 117 | 0.0102% | 269 | 607 | 0.0481% |
| 1924 | 600 | 113 | 0.0097% | 278 | 563 | 0.0434% |
| 1923 | 567 | 122 | 0.0108% | 263 | 599 | 0.0478% |
| 1922 | 556 | 130 | 0.0115% | 273 | 568 | 0.0455% |
| 1921 | 558 | 127 | 0.0112% | 270 | 612 | 0.0479% |
| 1920 | 528 | 134 | 0.0122% | 250 | 690 | 0.0555% |
| 1919 | 491 | 149 | 0.0147% | 250 | 659 | 0.0561% |
| 1918 | 540 | 124 | 0.0118% | 248 | 665 | 0.0553% |
| 1917 | 487 | 140 | 0.0146% | 237 | 689 | 0.0613% |
| 1916 | 459 | 153 | 0.0166% | 235 | 677 | 0.0624% |
| 1915 | 465 | 140 | 0.0159% | 224 | 699 | 0.0683% |
| 1914 | 481 | 102 | 0.0149% | 222 | 564 | 0.0710% |
| 1913 | 477 | 83 | 0.0155% | 232 | 426 | 0.0652% |
| 1912 | 540 | 55 | 0.0122% | 213 | 435 | 0.0743% |
| 1911 | 588 | 27 | 0.0112% | 209 | 337 | 0.0765% |
| 1910 | 590 | 24 | 0.0115% | 205 | 315 | 0.0753% |
| 1909 | 489 | 28 | 0.0159% | 228 | 245 | 0.0667% |
| 1908 | 569 | 20 | 0.0120% | 205 | 266 | 0.0751% |
| 1907 | 677 | 15 | 0.0095% | 202 | 257 | 0.0762% |
| 1906 | 625 | 15 | 0.0104% | 212 | 215 | 0.0686% |
| 1905 | 404 | 28 | 0.0195% | 211 | 215 | 0.0694% |
| 1904 | 499 | 19 | 0.0137% | 225 | 186 | 0.0636% |
| 1903 | 313 | 36 | 0.0278% | 219 | 190 | 0.0683% |
| 1902 | 349 | 32 | 0.0241% | 223 | 181 | 0.0646% |
| 1901 | 365 | 26 | 0.0225% | 235 | 151 | 0.0594% |
| 1900 | 416 | 30 | 0.0185% | 249 | 170 | 0.0534% |
| 1899 | 388 | 23 | 0.0200% | 235 | 139 | 0.0562% |
| 1898 | 398 | 25 | 0.0189% | 223 | 171 | 0.0624% |
| 1897 | 591 | 13 | 0.0107% | 236 | 141 | 0.0568% |
| 1896 | 430 | 21 | 0.0163% | 281 | 107 | 0.0425% |
| 1895 | 401 | 23 | 0.0182% | 257 | 121 | 0.0490% |
| 1894 | 302 | 34 | 0.0272% | 242 | 124 | 0.0525% |
| 1893 | 294 | 35 | 0.0289% | 283 | 89 | 0.0395% |
| 1892 | 429 | 20 | 0.0152% | 270 | 97 | 0.0431% |
| 1891 | 380 | 21 | 0.0192% | 253 | 92 | 0.0468% |
| 1890 | 353 | 25 | 0.0209% | 250 | 99 | 0.0491% |
| 1889 | 420 | 19 | 0.0160% | 256 | 84 | 0.0444% |
| 1888 | 538 | 14 | 0.0108% | 295 | 64 | 0.0338% |
| 1887 | 412 | 17 | 0.0155% | 312 | 47 | 0.0302% |
| 1886 | 342 | 25 | 0.0210% | 353 | 37 | 0.0241% |
| 1885 | 427 | 18 | 0.0155% | 285 | 49 | 0.0345% |
| 1884 | 403 | 20 | 0.0163% | 317 | 39 | 0.0283% |
| 1883 | 466 | 15 | 0.0133% | 338 | 28 | 0.0233% |
| 1882 | 476 | 15 | 0.0123% | 302 | 34 | 0.0294% |
| 1881 | 448 | 15 | 0.0138% | 399 | 18 | 0.0182% |
| 1880 | 471 | 15 | 0.0127% | 478 | 13 | 0.0133% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
