
Eunice: Statistics About The Baby Name Eunice
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 895 | 211 | 0.0110% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 930 | 201 | 0.0103% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 941 | 200 | 0.0102% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 904 | 216 | 0.0108% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 964 | 196 | 0.0096% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 928 | 204 | 0.0099% |
| 1989 | * | * | * | 978 | 177 | 0.0089% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 841 | 214 | 0.0112% |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 919 | 180 | 0.0096% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 942 | 168 | 0.0091% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 972 | 158 | 0.0086% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 984 | 147 | 0.0082% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 908 | 166 | 0.0092% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 883 | 173 | 0.0097% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 928 | 152 | 0.0093% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 943 | 147 | 0.0089% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 821 | 169 | 0.0108% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 815 | 168 | 0.0108% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 830 | 159 | 0.0102% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 762 | 177 | 0.0114% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 779 | 175 | 0.0109% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 787 | 184 | 0.0105% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 762 | 190 | 0.0104% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 716 | 197 | 0.0112% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 686 | 201 | 0.0118% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 683 | 201 | 0.0117% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 631 | 229 | 0.0130% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 623 | 245 | 0.0134% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 565 | 304 | 0.0155% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 562 | 304 | 0.0153% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 561 | 304 | 0.0150% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 539 | 333 | 0.0161% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 533 | 327 | 0.0157% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 499 | 384 | 0.0185% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 486 | 384 | 0.0186% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 452 | 436 | 0.0208% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 456 | 405 | 0.0197% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 425 | 431 | 0.0215% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 423 | 423 | 0.0213% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 398 | 454 | 0.0236% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 367 | 507 | 0.0267% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 349 | 525 | 0.0285% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 332 | 542 | 0.0308% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 328 | 555 | 0.0316% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 314 | 601 | 0.0345% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 297 | 704 | 0.0388% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 291 | 631 | 0.0392% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 275 | 631 | 0.0469% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 255 | 715 | 0.0524% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 246 | 780 | 0.0545% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 239 | 801 | 0.0576% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 227 | 770 | 0.0619% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 203 | 869 | 0.0736% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 205 | 846 | 0.0746% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 195 | 943 | 0.0826% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 186 | 1,043 | 0.0947% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 179 | 1,061 | 0.0985% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 170 | 1,127 | 0.1038% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 161 | 1,229 | 0.1136% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 154 | 1,189 | 0.1138% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 146 | 1,376 | 0.1244% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 147 | 1,342 | 0.1217% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 148 | 1,439 | 0.1235% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 145 | 1,539 | 0.1330% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 137 | 1,725 | 0.1444% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,945 | 0.1574% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,940 | 0.1578% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 130 | 2,089 | 0.1655% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 129 | 2,153 | 0.1662% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,112 | 0.1687% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,182 | 0.1750% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 120 | 2,243 | 0.1754% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 115 | 2,237 | 0.1799% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,061 | 0.1755% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 111 | 2,227 | 0.1852% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 111 | 2,034 | 0.1811% |
| 1916 | 930 | 47 | 0.0051% | 110 | 1,955 | 0.1802% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 109 | 1,861 | 0.1819% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 109 | 1,475 | 0.1856% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 107 | 1,211 | 0.1854% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 109 | 1,064 | 0.1818% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 109 | 828 | 0.1880% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 113 | 741 | 0.1770% |
| 1909 | 972 | 10 | 0.0057% | 117 | 624 | 0.1698% |
| 1908 | 848 | 11 | 0.0066% | 106 | 675 | 0.1907% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 111 | 608 | 0.1803% |
| 1906 | 812 | 10 | 0.0069% | 114 | 554 | 0.1769% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 122 | 525 | 0.1695% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 117 | 502 | 0.1717% |
| 1903 | 944 | 7 | 0.0054% | 119 | 469 | 0.1686% |
| 1902 | 966 | 7 | 0.0053% | 118 | 490 | 0.1748% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 122 | 424 | 0.1668% |
| 1900 | 709 | 13 | 0.0080% | 125 | 504 | 0.1585% |
| 1899 | 969 | 6 | 0.0052% | 126 | 385 | 0.1556% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 123 | 437 | 0.1594% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 127 | 387 | 0.1559% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 136 | 351 | 0.1393% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 137 | 334 | 0.1352% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 148 | 295 | 0.1250% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 135 | 310 | 0.1376% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 142 | 294 | 0.1307% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 148 | 237 | 0.1206% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 166 | 214 | 0.1061% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 163 | 185 | 0.0978% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 162 | 180 | 0.0950% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 172 | 136 | 0.0875% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 163 | 142 | 0.0924% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 157 | 136 | 0.0958% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 167 | 112 | 0.0814% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 161 | 106 | 0.0883% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 185 | 75 | 0.0648% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 172 | 77 | 0.0779% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 182 | 67 | 0.0686% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
