
Eugenia: Statistics About The Baby Name Eugenia
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 969 | 149 | 0.0083% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 900 | 168 | 0.0094% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 896 | 169 | 0.0093% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 880 | 173 | 0.0097% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 847 | 183 | 0.0103% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 839 | 185 | 0.0107% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 766 | 201 | 0.0122% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 807 | 186 | 0.0113% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 778 | 184 | 0.0117% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 666 | 229 | 0.0147% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 640 | 238 | 0.0152% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 706 | 209 | 0.0135% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 616 | 255 | 0.0158% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 547 | 328 | 0.0187% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 550 | 337 | 0.0184% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 579 | 291 | 0.0165% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 587 | 267 | 0.0156% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 529 | 320 | 0.0186% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 544 | 299 | 0.0170% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 501 | 360 | 0.0197% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 507 | 374 | 0.0191% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 511 | 362 | 0.0182% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 511 | 362 | 0.0179% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 543 | 330 | 0.0159% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 518 | 348 | 0.0167% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 552 | 312 | 0.0150% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 541 | 321 | 0.0156% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 509 | 351 | 0.0167% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 518 | 328 | 0.0159% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 480 | 357 | 0.0178% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 477 | 350 | 0.0176% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 468 | 329 | 0.0171% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 484 | 303 | 0.0159% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 441 | 357 | 0.0194% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 429 | 352 | 0.0200% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 454 | 310 | 0.0177% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 462 | 300 | 0.0172% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 427 | 363 | 0.0200% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 470 | 278 | 0.0173% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 418 | 291 | 0.0216% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 405 | 312 | 0.0229% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 415 | 308 | 0.0215% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 396 | 325 | 0.0234% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 420 | 270 | 0.0217% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 432 | 248 | 0.0210% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 430 | 246 | 0.0217% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 437 | 236 | 0.0207% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 396 | 269 | 0.0244% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 400 | 253 | 0.0235% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 387 | 271 | 0.0249% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 399 | 264 | 0.0244% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 376 | 291 | 0.0278% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 343 | 342 | 0.0309% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 351 | 331 | 0.0300% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 366 | 338 | 0.0290% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 324 | 398 | 0.0344% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 330 | 409 | 0.0342% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 311 | 461 | 0.0373% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 299 | 496 | 0.0404% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 308 | 463 | 0.0367% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 281 | 551 | 0.0425% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 269 | 570 | 0.0455% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 290 | 508 | 0.0407% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 274 | 602 | 0.0471% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 270 | 586 | 0.0471% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 260 | 607 | 0.0517% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 271 | 561 | 0.0467% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 276 | 495 | 0.0441% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 262 | 536 | 0.0494% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 260 | 506 | 0.0495% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 273 | 365 | 0.0459% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 264 | 309 | 0.0473% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 276 | 266 | 0.0455% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 261 | 219 | 0.0497% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 299 | 167 | 0.0399% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 312 | 137 | 0.0373% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 308 | 131 | 0.0370% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 334 | 110 | 0.0326% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 321 | 109 | 0.0348% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 312 | 116 | 0.0374% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 303 | 113 | 0.0386% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 312 | 100 | 0.0360% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 332 | 89 | 0.0317% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 325 | 87 | 0.0342% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 318 | 112 | 0.0352% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 276 | 109 | 0.0440% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 329 | 91 | 0.0332% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 296 | 96 | 0.0387% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 293 | 99 | 0.0393% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 318 | 83 | 0.0336% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 296 | 85 | 0.0360% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 301 | 82 | 0.0364% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 282 | 91 | 0.0405% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 271 | 83 | 0.0422% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 273 | 83 | 0.0412% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 269 | 78 | 0.0412% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 279 | 70 | 0.0369% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 266 | 63 | 0.0405% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 245 | 71 | 0.0462% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 242 | 68 | 0.0479% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 296 | 42 | 0.0305% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 262 | 48 | 0.0400% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 190 | 73 | 0.0631% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 252 | 40 | 0.0405% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 247 | 40 | 0.0410% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
