
Ethel: Statistics About The Baby Name Ethel
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 896 | 147 | 0.0094% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 952 | 130 | 0.0083% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 755 | 180 | 0.0116% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 766 | 181 | 0.0112% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 693 | 220 | 0.0126% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 696 | 225 | 0.0123% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 599 | 276 | 0.0157% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 569 | 282 | 0.0165% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 514 | 341 | 0.0199% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 492 | 361 | 0.0206% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 456 | 441 | 0.0241% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 431 | 517 | 0.0264% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 426 | 522 | 0.0263% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 393 | 584 | 0.0288% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 381 | 631 | 0.0304% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 359 | 730 | 0.0351% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 363 | 680 | 0.0327% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 310 | 857 | 0.0415% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 310 | 880 | 0.0420% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,073 | 0.0521% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 248 | 1,100 | 0.0549% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 235 | 1,169 | 0.0587% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 224 | 1,287 | 0.0668% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 207 | 1,395 | 0.0733% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 193 | 1,485 | 0.0806% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 176 | 1,610 | 0.0916% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 163 | 1,761 | 0.1004% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 152 | 1,881 | 0.1080% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 144 | 2,076 | 0.1143% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 140 | 1,926 | 0.1196% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,813 | 0.1347% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 127 | 2,064 | 0.1512% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,202 | 0.1538% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 124 | 2,204 | 0.1584% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 114 | 2,275 | 0.1828% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 106 | 2,371 | 0.2007% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 100 | 2,495 | 0.2200% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,723 | 0.2386% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 88 | 2,769 | 0.2514% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 90 | 2,724 | 0.2529% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,001 | 0.2763% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,173 | 0.2933% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,220 | 0.3081% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 65 | 3,614 | 0.3268% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,761 | 0.3412% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 65 | 4,097 | 0.3516% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 56 | 4,505 | 0.3894% |
| 1928 | 995 | 48 | 0.0042% | 55 | 4,915 | 0.4116% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 47 | 5,484 | 0.4438% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 41 | 5,863 | 0.4770% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 43 | 6,159 | 0.4879% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 39 | 6,599 | 0.5093% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 38 | 6,529 | 0.5214% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,238 | 0.5804% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 32 | 7,592 | 0.5938% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,855 | 0.6317% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,814 | 0.6653% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 28 | 8,083 | 0.6722% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 24 | 7,860 | 0.6999% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 25 | 7,597 | 0.7002% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 23 | 7,374 | 0.7207% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 22 | 6,188 | 0.7786% |
| 1913 | 976 | 26 | 0.0049% | 20 | 5,360 | 0.8208% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 18 | 5,063 | 0.8652% |
| 1911 | 802 | 17 | 0.0071% | 14 | 4,128 | 0.9373% |
| 1910 | 483 | 33 | 0.0159% | 13 | 4,143 | 0.9898% |
| 1909 | 521 | 25 | 0.0142% | 13 | 3,655 | 0.9948% |
| 1908 | 545 | 22 | 0.0132% | 12 | 3,781 | 1.0679% |
| 1907 | 786 | 12 | 0.0076% | 12 | 3,697 | 1.0965% |
| 1906 | 598 | 16 | 0.0111% | 12 | 3,508 | 1.1199% |
| 1905 | 645 | 14 | 0.0098% | 12 | 3,400 | 1.0976% |
| 1904 | 545 | 17 | 0.0123% | 11 | 3,294 | 1.1265% |
| 1903 | 476 | 20 | 0.0155% | 9 | 3,256 | 1.1706% |
| 1902 | 492 | 19 | 0.0143% | 9 | 3,295 | 1.1754% |
| 1901 | 493 | 16 | 0.0138% | 9 | 3,068 | 1.2068% |
| 1900 | 541 | 20 | 0.0123% | 8 | 3,896 | 1.2249% |
| 1899 | 508 | 15 | 0.0130% | 9 | 2,999 | 1.2117% |
| 1898 | 406 | 24 | 0.0182% | 8 | 3,531 | 1.2879% |
| 1897 | 484 | 17 | 0.0139% | 8 | 3,180 | 1.2808% |
| 1896 | 651 | 12 | 0.0093% | 6 | 3,503 | 1.3900% |
| 1895 | 534 | 15 | 0.0118% | 8 | 3,391 | 1.3722% |
| 1894 | 645 | 11 | 0.0088% | 7 | 3,287 | 1.3928% |
| 1893 | 586 | 12 | 0.0099% | 8 | 3,119 | 1.3847% |
| 1892 | 485 | 17 | 0.0129% | 8 | 3,035 | 1.3493% |
| 1891 | 660 | 9 | 0.0082% | 7 | 2,689 | 1.3679% |
| 1890 | 769 | 8 | 0.0067% | 7 | 2,718 | 1.3477% |
| 1889 | 507 | 14 | 0.0118% | 8 | 2,463 | 1.3016% |
| 1888 | 589 | 12 | 0.0092% | 9 | 2,374 | 1.2530% |
| 1887 | 604 | 10 | 0.0091% | 11 | 1,907 | 1.2269% |
| 1886 | 881 | 6 | 0.0050% | 15 | 1,699 | 1.1050% |
| 1885 | 526 | 13 | 0.0112% | 15 | 1,495 | 1.0531% |
| 1884 | 800 | 7 | 0.0057% | 18 | 1,386 | 1.0073% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 20 | 1,132 | 0.9427% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 24 | 989 | 0.8548% |
| 1881 | 917 | 5 | 0.0046% | 25 | 788 | 0.7970% |
| 1880 | 854 | 6 | 0.0051% | 38 | 633 | 0.6484% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
