Essie: Statistics About The Baby Name Essie
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1963 | * | * | * | 943 | 125 | 0.0063% |
1960 | * | * | * | 879 | 140 | 0.0067% |
1959 | * | * | * | 808 | 160 | 0.0077% |
1958 | * | * | * | 813 | 153 | 0.0074% |
1957 | * | * | * | 789 | 163 | 0.0078% |
1956 | * | * | * | 664 | 209 | 0.0102% |
1955 | * | * | * | 616 | 226 | 0.0113% |
1954 | * | * | * | 596 | 231 | 0.0116% |
1953 | * | * | * | 532 | 261 | 0.0135% |
1952 | * | * | * | 495 | 287 | 0.0151% |
1951 | * | * | * | 504 | 267 | 0.0145% |
1950 | * | * | * | 457 | 315 | 0.0179% |
1949 | * | * | * | 434 | 333 | 0.0190% |
1948 | * | * | * | 444 | 320 | 0.0184% |
1947 | * | * | * | 448 | 330 | 0.0182% |
1946 | * | * | * | 414 | 342 | 0.0212% |
1945 | * | * | * | 352 | 384 | 0.0285% |
1944 | * | * | * | 337 | 412 | 0.0302% |
1943 | * | * | * | 391 | 347 | 0.0242% |
1942 | * | * | * | 340 | 421 | 0.0303% |
1941 | * | * | * | 333 | 390 | 0.0313% |
1940 | * | * | * | 309 | 422 | 0.0357% |
1939 | * | * | * | 290 | 458 | 0.0404% |
1938 | * | * | * | 295 | 451 | 0.0395% |
1937 | * | * | * | 284 | 468 | 0.0425% |
1936 | * | * | * | 273 | 494 | 0.0459% |
1935 | * | * | * | 272 | 497 | 0.0458% |
1934 | * | * | * | 266 | 540 | 0.0499% |
1933 | * | * | * | 255 | 568 | 0.0543% |
1932 | * | * | * | 234 | 675 | 0.0610% |
1931 | * | * | * | 251 | 579 | 0.0525% |
1930 | * | * | * | 252 | 611 | 0.0524% |
1929 | * | * | * | 234 | 673 | 0.0582% |
1928 | * | * | * | 222 | 796 | 0.0667% |
1927 | * | * | * | 225 | 788 | 0.0638% |
1926 | * | * | * | 211 | 880 | 0.0716% |
1925 | * | * | * | 211 | 925 | 0.0733% |
1924 | * | * | * | 209 | 936 | 0.0722% |
1923 | * | * | * | 212 | 920 | 0.0735% |
1922 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,014 | 0.0813% |
1921 | * | * | * | 198 | 1,033 | 0.0808% |
1920 | * | * | * | 196 | 997 | 0.0802% |
1919 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,022 | 0.0870% |
1918 | * | * | * | 195 | 1,014 | 0.0843% |
1917 | * | * | * | 195 | 942 | 0.0839% |
1916 | * | * | * | 198 | 898 | 0.0828% |
1915 | * | * | * | 192 | 870 | 0.0850% |
1914 | * | * | * | 180 | 735 | 0.0925% |
1913 | * | * | * | 175 | 659 | 0.1009% |
1912 | 946 | 23 | 0.0051% | 157 | 692 | 0.1183% |
1911 | 902 | 14 | 0.0058% | 156 | 523 | 0.1187% |
1910 | * | * | * | 131 | 620 | 0.1481% |
1909 | * | * | * | 139 | 507 | 0.1380% |
1908 | 721 | 14 | 0.0084% | 148 | 451 | 0.1274% |
1907 | 785 | 12 | 0.0076% | 137 | 486 | 0.1441% |
1906 | * | * | * | 145 | 408 | 0.1303% |
1905 | 860 | 9 | 0.0063% | 133 | 475 | 0.1533% |
1904 | 830 | 9 | 0.0065% | 129 | 458 | 0.1566% |
1903 | 942 | 7 | 0.0054% | 140 | 397 | 0.1427% |
1902 | 813 | 9 | 0.0068% | 133 | 422 | 0.1505% |
1901 | * | * | * | 136 | 368 | 0.1448% |
1900 | 993 | 8 | 0.0049% | 129 | 492 | 0.1547% |
1899 | 591 | 12 | 0.0104% | 136 | 342 | 0.1382% |
1898 | 769 | 9 | 0.0068% | 150 | 336 | 0.1226% |
1897 | 561 | 14 | 0.0115% | 145 | 329 | 0.1325% |
1896 | 925 | 7 | 0.0054% | 126 | 381 | 0.1512% |
1895 | 756 | 9 | 0.0071% | 136 | 335 | 0.1356% |
1894 | 471 | 18 | 0.0144% | 137 | 311 | 0.1318% |
1893 | * | * | * | 153 | 258 | 0.1145% |
1892 | * | * | * | 141 | 294 | 0.1307% |
1891 | 614 | 10 | 0.0092% | 157 | 217 | 0.1104% |
1890 | * | * | * | 138 | 256 | 0.1269% |
1889 | 598 | 11 | 0.0092% | 136 | 265 | 0.1400% |
1888 | * | * | * | 143 | 230 | 0.1214% |
1887 | * | * | * | 140 | 185 | 0.1190% |
1886 | * | * | * | 149 | 163 | 0.1060% |
1885 | 791 | 7 | 0.0060% | 149 | 153 | 0.1078% |
1884 | * | * | * | 142 | 148 | 0.1076% |
1883 | * | * | * | 140 | 139 | 0.1158% |
1882 | 780 | 7 | 0.0057% | 153 | 113 | 0.0977% |
1881 | 915 | 5 | 0.0046% | 168 | 80 | 0.0809% |
1880 | * | * | * | 168 | 78 | 0.0799% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |