Erwin: Statistics About The Baby Name Erwin
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1992 | 974 | 123 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1991 | 953 | 125 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1989 | 963 | 112 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1987 | 932 | 103 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1986 | 906 | 102 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1985 | 937 | 94 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1984 | 931 | 89 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1983 | 945 | 87 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1982 | 956 | 88 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1981 | 821 | 114 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1980 | 834 | 111 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1979 | 967 | 84 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1978 | 939 | 85 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1977 | 884 | 92 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1976 | 954 | 76 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1975 | 927 | 77 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1974 | 914 | 79 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1973 | 833 | 91 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1972 | 775 | 106 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1971 | 779 | 109 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1970 | 791 | 108 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1969 | 710 | 121 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1968 | 782 | 90 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1967 | 639 | 136 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
1966 | 654 | 128 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1965 | 639 | 138 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1964 | 603 | 171 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
1963 | 626 | 155 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
1962 | 618 | 156 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
1961 | 621 | 164 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
1960 | 570 | 188 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1959 | 567 | 189 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1958 | 560 | 191 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
1957 | 526 | 217 | 0.0099% | * | * | * |
1956 | 536 | 195 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
1955 | 555 | 175 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
1954 | 551 | 174 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
1953 | 570 | 157 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1952 | 564 | 154 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1951 | 536 | 158 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1950 | 561 | 144 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1949 | 562 | 144 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1948 | 487 | 185 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1947 | 578 | 138 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
1946 | 499 | 166 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
1945 | 491 | 151 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
1944 | 482 | 158 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
1943 | 424 | 211 | 0.0146% | * | * | * |
1942 | 443 | 196 | 0.0139% | * | * | * |
1941 | 510 | 134 | 0.0107% | * | * | * |
1940 | 431 | 184 | 0.0155% | * | * | * |
1939 | 458 | 157 | 0.0138% | * | * | * |
1938 | 391 | 211 | 0.0186% | * | * | * |
1937 | 400 | 195 | 0.0179% | * | * | * |
1936 | 346 | 248 | 0.0233% | * | * | * |
1935 | 350 | 249 | 0.0233% | * | * | * |
1934 | 322 | 285 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
1933 | 332 | 261 | 0.0256% | * | * | * |
1932 | 313 | 305 | 0.0284% | * | * | * |
1931 | 304 | 336 | 0.0315% | * | * | * |
1930 | 297 | 371 | 0.0329% | * | * | * |
1929 | 286 | 376 | 0.0340% | * | * | * |
1928 | 283 | 394 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
1927 | 280 | 409 | 0.0353% | * | * | * |
1926 | 266 | 461 | 0.0403% | * | * | * |
1925 | 276 | 431 | 0.0375% | * | * | * |
1924 | 257 | 501 | 0.0429% | * | * | * |
1923 | 267 | 444 | 0.0392% | * | * | * |
1922 | 250 | 504 | 0.0448% | * | * | * |
1921 | 251 | 496 | 0.0436% | * | * | * |
1920 | 255 | 459 | 0.0417% | * | * | * |
1919 | 252 | 444 | 0.0437% | * | * | * |
1918 | 233 | 511 | 0.0487% | * | * | * |
1917 | 228 | 475 | 0.0495% | * | * | * |
1916 | 220 | 486 | 0.0526% | * | * | * |
1915 | 236 | 423 | 0.0480% | * | * | * |
1914 | 221 | 360 | 0.0527% | * | * | * |
1913 | 228 | 275 | 0.0513% | * | * | * |
1912 | 243 | 210 | 0.0466% | * | * | * |
1911 | 273 | 91 | 0.0378% | * | * | * |
1910 | 289 | 72 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
1909 | 255 | 76 | 0.0430% | * | * | * |
1908 | 285 | 58 | 0.0349% | * | * | * |
1907 | 309 | 47 | 0.0297% | * | * | * |
1906 | 244 | 65 | 0.0451% | * | * | * |
1905 | 261 | 58 | 0.0405% | * | * | * |
1904 | 266 | 52 | 0.0375% | * | * | * |
1903 | 244 | 57 | 0.0441% | * | * | * |
1902 | 271 | 49 | 0.0369% | * | * | * |
1901 | 216 | 63 | 0.0545% | * | * | * |
1900 | 321 | 44 | 0.0271% | * | * | * |
1899 | 247 | 46 | 0.0399% | * | * | * |
1898 | 259 | 48 | 0.0363% | * | * | * |
1897 | 260 | 46 | 0.0377% | * | * | * |
1896 | 257 | 50 | 0.0387% | * | * | * |
1895 | 262 | 46 | 0.0363% | * | * | * |
1894 | 297 | 35 | 0.0280% | * | * | * |
1893 | 302 | 33 | 0.0273% | * | * | * |
1892 | 332 | 32 | 0.0243% | * | * | * |
1891 | 285 | 33 | 0.0302% | * | * | * |
1890 | 291 | 35 | 0.0292% | * | * | * |
1889 | 327 | 29 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
1888 | 349 | 28 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
1887 | 335 | 24 | 0.0220% | * | * | * |
1886 | 372 | 22 | 0.0185% | * | * | * |
1885 | 334 | 26 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
1884 | 455 | 17 | 0.0138% | * | * | * |
1883 | 326 | 26 | 0.0231% | * | * | * |
1882 | 553 | 12 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
1881 | 422 | 17 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
1880 | 446 | 16 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |