Emilie: Statistics About The Baby Name Emilie
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2016 | * | * | * | 886 | 316 | 0.0164% |
2015 | * | * | * | 867 | 319 | 0.0165% |
2014 | * | * | * | 732 | 380 | 0.0196% |
2013 | * | * | * | 561 | 515 | 0.0270% |
2012 | * | * | * | 733 | 376 | 0.0196% |
2011 | * | * | * | 712 | 385 | 0.0200% |
2010 | * | * | * | 734 | 377 | 0.0194% |
2009 | * | * | * | 715 | 399 | 0.0199% |
2008 | * | * | * | 690 | 436 | 0.0212% |
2007 | * | * | * | 582 | 507 | 0.0243% |
2006 | * | * | * | 491 | 622 | 0.0302% |
2005 | * | * | * | 485 | 616 | 0.0309% |
2004 | * | * | * | 457 | 650 | 0.0327% |
2003 | * | * | * | 454 | 656 | 0.0329% |
2002 | * | * | * | 458 | 622 | 0.0316% |
2001 | * | * | * | 445 | 622 | 0.0315% |
2000 | * | * | * | 483 | 561 | 0.0282% |
1999 | * | * | * | 472 | 555 | 0.0286% |
1998 | * | * | * | 519 | 485 | 0.0251% |
1997 | * | * | * | 478 | 525 | 0.0275% |
1996 | * | * | * | 475 | 519 | 0.0271% |
1995 | * | * | * | 506 | 482 | 0.0251% |
1994 | * | * | * | 513 | 485 | 0.0249% |
1993 | * | * | * | 528 | 455 | 0.0231% |
1992 | * | * | * | 591 | 386 | 0.0193% |
1991 | * | * | * | 622 | 363 | 0.0179% |
1990 | * | * | * | 616 | 365 | 0.0178% |
1989 | * | * | * | 667 | 304 | 0.0153% |
1988 | * | * | * | 640 | 309 | 0.0161% |
1987 | * | * | * | 673 | 275 | 0.0147% |
1986 | * | * | * | 742 | 237 | 0.0129% |
1985 | * | * | * | 647 | 285 | 0.0155% |
1984 | * | * | * | 677 | 249 | 0.0138% |
1983 | * | * | * | 746 | 219 | 0.0123% |
1982 | * | * | * | 657 | 271 | 0.0150% |
1981 | * | * | * | 660 | 267 | 0.0150% |
1980 | * | * | * | 748 | 221 | 0.0124% |
1979 | * | * | * | 775 | 206 | 0.0120% |
1978 | * | * | * | 818 | 183 | 0.0111% |
1977 | * | * | * | 938 | 148 | 0.0090% |
1976 | * | * | * | 980 | 130 | 0.0083% |
1975 | * | * | * | 714 | 207 | 0.0133% |
1950 | * | * | * | 989 | 85 | 0.0048% |
1949 | * | * | * | 985 | 83 | 0.0047% |
1948 | * | * | * | 979 | 79 | 0.0045% |
1947 | * | * | * | 891 | 98 | 0.0054% |
1946 | * | * | * | 807 | 104 | 0.0065% |
1945 | * | * | * | 811 | 87 | 0.0065% |
1944 | * | * | * | 775 | 97 | 0.0071% |
1943 | * | * | * | 723 | 114 | 0.0080% |
1942 | * | * | * | 689 | 117 | 0.0084% |
1941 | * | * | * | 567 | 151 | 0.0121% |
1940 | * | * | * | 538 | 162 | 0.0137% |
1939 | * | * | * | 506 | 176 | 0.0155% |
1938 | * | * | * | 537 | 160 | 0.0140% |
1937 | * | * | * | 491 | 178 | 0.0162% |
1936 | * | * | * | 541 | 146 | 0.0136% |
1935 | * | * | * | 627 | 108 | 0.0099% |
1934 | * | * | * | 812 | 69 | 0.0064% |
1933 | * | * | * | 929 | 54 | 0.0052% |
1931 | * | * | * | 839 | 67 | 0.0061% |
1930 | * | * | * | 883 | 67 | 0.0057% |
1929 | * | * | * | 770 | 82 | 0.0071% |
1928 | * | * | * | 776 | 86 | 0.0072% |
1927 | * | * | * | 715 | 102 | 0.0083% |
1926 | * | * | * | 659 | 120 | 0.0098% |
1925 | * | * | * | 693 | 113 | 0.0090% |
1924 | * | * | * | 579 | 161 | 0.0124% |
1923 | * | * | * | 578 | 155 | 0.0124% |
1922 | * | * | * | 548 | 169 | 0.0136% |
1921 | * | * | * | 594 | 148 | 0.0116% |
1920 | * | * | * | 497 | 193 | 0.0155% |
1919 | * | * | * | 529 | 168 | 0.0143% |
1918 | * | * | * | 534 | 173 | 0.0144% |
1917 | * | * | * | 547 | 151 | 0.0134% |
1916 | * | * | * | 536 | 153 | 0.0141% |
1915 | * | * | * | 487 | 160 | 0.0156% |
1914 | * | * | * | 528 | 111 | 0.0140% |
1913 | * | * | * | 511 | 98 | 0.0150% |
1912 | * | * | * | 512 | 89 | 0.0152% |
1911 | * | * | * | 569 | 57 | 0.0129% |
1910 | * | * | * | 579 | 51 | 0.0122% |
1909 | * | * | * | 554 | 48 | 0.0131% |
1908 | * | * | * | 489 | 55 | 0.0155% |
1907 | * | * | * | 440 | 66 | 0.0196% |
1906 | * | * | * | 478 | 51 | 0.0163% |
1905 | * | * | * | 477 | 51 | 0.0165% |
1904 | * | * | * | 550 | 37 | 0.0127% |
1903 | * | * | * | 415 | 58 | 0.0209% |
1902 | * | * | * | 393 | 63 | 0.0225% |
1901 | * | * | * | 443 | 45 | 0.0177% |
1900 | * | * | * | 438 | 58 | 0.0182% |
1899 | * | * | * | 384 | 57 | 0.0230% |
1898 | * | * | * | 378 | 68 | 0.0248% |
1897 | * | * | * | 335 | 77 | 0.0310% |
1896 | * | * | * | 338 | 74 | 0.0294% |
1895 | * | * | * | 337 | 72 | 0.0291% |
1894 | * | * | * | 307 | 81 | 0.0343% |
1893 | * | * | * | 294 | 85 | 0.0377% |
1892 | * | * | * | 279 | 92 | 0.0409% |
1891 | * | * | * | 265 | 85 | 0.0432% |
1890 | * | * | * | 304 | 68 | 0.0337% |
1889 | * | * | * | 310 | 62 | 0.0328% |
1888 | * | * | * | 291 | 65 | 0.0343% |
1887 | * | * | * | 255 | 67 | 0.0431% |
1886 | * | * | * | 266 | 61 | 0.0397% |
1885 | * | * | * | 256 | 60 | 0.0423% |
1884 | * | * | * | 269 | 53 | 0.0385% |
1883 | * | * | * | 238 | 56 | 0.0466% |
1882 | * | * | * | 260 | 45 | 0.0389% |
1881 | * | * | * | 263 | 38 | 0.0384% |
1880 | * | * | * | 228 | 46 | 0.0471% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |