Emil: Statistics About The Baby Name Emil
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1984 | 968 | 84 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1983 | 890 | 98 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1982 | 994 | 82 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1980 | 942 | 90 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1979 | 901 | 94 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1978 | 916 | 89 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1977 | 943 | 82 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1976 | 885 | 89 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1975 | 842 | 97 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1974 | 841 | 91 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1973 | 788 | 101 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1972 | 837 | 92 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1971 | 820 | 97 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1970 | 739 | 123 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1969 | 746 | 110 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1968 | 752 | 97 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1967 | 730 | 102 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1966 | 740 | 99 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1965 | 625 | 147 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1964 | 674 | 131 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1963 | 691 | 126 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1962 | 644 | 145 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
1961 | 637 | 151 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1960 | 616 | 161 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
1959 | 608 | 162 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
1958 | 594 | 169 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1957 | 561 | 187 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
1956 | 575 | 174 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
1955 | 550 | 179 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
1954 | 543 | 179 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1953 | 517 | 184 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
1952 | 492 | 205 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1951 | 462 | 216 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
1950 | 467 | 205 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
1949 | 455 | 214 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
1948 | 424 | 250 | 0.0141% | * | * | * |
1947 | 426 | 254 | 0.0137% | * | * | * |
1946 | 407 | 246 | 0.0150% | * | * | * |
1945 | 400 | 224 | 0.0164% | * | * | * |
1944 | 404 | 220 | 0.0159% | * | * | * |
1943 | 378 | 262 | 0.0181% | * | * | * |
1942 | 376 | 261 | 0.0185% | * | * | * |
1941 | 334 | 295 | 0.0236% | * | * | * |
1940 | 350 | 264 | 0.0223% | * | * | * |
1939 | 340 | 273 | 0.0241% | * | * | * |
1938 | 304 | 322 | 0.0284% | * | * | * |
1937 | 327 | 275 | 0.0252% | * | * | * |
1936 | 331 | 273 | 0.0257% | * | * | * |
1935 | 304 | 320 | 0.0300% | * | * | * |
1934 | 296 | 335 | 0.0316% | * | * | * |
1933 | 274 | 369 | 0.0362% | * | * | * |
1932 | 276 | 392 | 0.0365% | * | * | * |
1931 | 257 | 443 | 0.0415% | * | * | * |
1930 | 245 | 510 | 0.0452% | * | * | * |
1929 | 249 | 497 | 0.0450% | * | * | * |
1928 | 226 | 581 | 0.0510% | * | * | * |
1927 | 213 | 621 | 0.0535% | * | * | * |
1926 | 203 | 681 | 0.0595% | * | * | * |
1925 | 190 | 723 | 0.0629% | * | * | * |
1924 | 181 | 787 | 0.0674% | * | * | * |
1923 | 175 | 796 | 0.0703% | * | * | * |
1922 | 173 | 820 | 0.0728% | * | * | * |
1921 | 175 | 825 | 0.0725% | * | * | * |
1920 | 164 | 839 | 0.0762% | * | * | * |
1919 | 161 | 845 | 0.0832% | * | * | * |
1918 | 154 | 915 | 0.0871% | * | * | * |
1917 | 137 | 1,002 | 0.1044% | * | * | * |
1916 | 139 | 968 | 0.1048% | * | * | * |
1915 | 138 | 918 | 0.1042% | * | * | * |
1914 | 143 | 683 | 0.1000% | * | * | * |
1913 | 143 | 550 | 0.1027% | * | * | * |
1912 | 146 | 406 | 0.0900% | * | * | * |
1911 | 156 | 214 | 0.0888% | * | * | * |
1910 | 161 | 193 | 0.0927% | * | * | * |
1909 | 161 | 153 | 0.0866% | * | * | * |
1908 | 164 | 141 | 0.0848% | * | * | * |
1907 | 150 | 150 | 0.0946% | * | * | * |
1906 | 148 | 139 | 0.0965% | * | * | * |
1905 | 164 | 122 | 0.0852% | * | * | * |
1904 | 182 | 101 | 0.0729% | * | * | * |
1903 | 145 | 128 | 0.0990% | * | * | * |
1902 | 140 | 136 | 0.1024% | * | * | * |
1901 | 136 | 122 | 0.1055% | * | * | * |
1900 | 166 | 127 | 0.0781% | * | * | * |
1899 | 124 | 128 | 0.1111% | * | * | * |
1898 | 116 | 158 | 0.1196% | * | * | * |
1897 | 126 | 131 | 0.1074% | * | * | * |
1896 | 125 | 143 | 0.1108% | * | * | * |
1895 | 122 | 136 | 0.1074% | * | * | * |
1894 | 123 | 128 | 0.1025% | * | * | * |
1893 | 110 | 159 | 0.1313% | * | * | * |
1892 | 112 | 157 | 0.1194% | * | * | * |
1891 | 110 | 133 | 0.1217% | * | * | * |
1890 | 101 | 165 | 0.1378% | * | * | * |
1889 | 109 | 146 | 0.1226% | * | * | * |
1888 | 116 | 142 | 0.1093% | * | * | * |
1887 | 100 | 146 | 0.1335% | * | * | * |
1886 | 116 | 127 | 0.1067% | * | * | * |
1885 | 105 | 138 | 0.1190% | * | * | * |
1884 | 91 | 175 | 0.1426% | * | * | * |
1883 | 99 | 139 | 0.1236% | * | * | * |
1882 | 92 | 157 | 0.1286% | * | * | * |
1881 | 90 | 145 | 0.1339% | * | * | * |
1880 | 113 | 119 | 0.1005% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |