
Elma: Statistics About The Baby Name Elma
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 988 | 111 | 0.0054% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 983 | 103 | 0.0051% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 899 | 114 | 0.0057% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 806 | 130 | 0.0067% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 798 | 128 | 0.0067% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 794 | 125 | 0.0068% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 718 | 143 | 0.0081% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 683 | 150 | 0.0086% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 665 | 158 | 0.0091% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 640 | 167 | 0.0092% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 622 | 162 | 0.0101% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 546 | 180 | 0.0134% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 571 | 164 | 0.0120% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 524 | 204 | 0.0142% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 497 | 224 | 0.0161% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 498 | 195 | 0.0157% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 471 | 203 | 0.0172% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 468 | 204 | 0.0180% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 429 | 244 | 0.0214% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 436 | 225 | 0.0204% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 395 | 259 | 0.0240% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 393 | 266 | 0.0245% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 375 | 285 | 0.0263% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 368 | 297 | 0.0284% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 369 | 301 | 0.0272% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 340 | 348 | 0.0316% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 349 | 360 | 0.0309% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 341 | 363 | 0.0314% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 320 | 424 | 0.0355% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 308 | 464 | 0.0375% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 313 | 447 | 0.0364% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 301 | 488 | 0.0387% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 289 | 524 | 0.0404% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 292 | 491 | 0.0392% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 268 | 580 | 0.0465% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 271 | 611 | 0.0478% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 266 | 600 | 0.0483% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 262 | 593 | 0.0505% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 249 | 659 | 0.0548% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 257 | 580 | 0.0516% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 246 | 623 | 0.0574% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 246 | 573 | 0.0560% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 242 | 482 | 0.0606% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 245 | 388 | 0.0594% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 234 | 374 | 0.0639% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 248 | 251 | 0.0570% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 236 | 272 | 0.0650% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 227 | 248 | 0.0675% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 234 | 208 | 0.0587% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 219 | 228 | 0.0676% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 227 | 193 | 0.0616% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 245 | 171 | 0.0552% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 248 | 160 | 0.0547% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 235 | 162 | 0.0582% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 210 | 199 | 0.0710% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 209 | 189 | 0.0743% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 235 | 182 | 0.0572% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 238 | 136 | 0.0550% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 222 | 172 | 0.0627% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 218 | 156 | 0.0628% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 219 | 160 | 0.0635% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 234 | 137 | 0.0554% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 237 | 127 | 0.0538% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 231 | 129 | 0.0573% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 250 | 112 | 0.0498% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 223 | 118 | 0.0600% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 234 | 108 | 0.0536% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 235 | 98 | 0.0518% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 235 | 97 | 0.0512% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 246 | 73 | 0.0470% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 223 | 82 | 0.0533% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 227 | 76 | 0.0535% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 254 | 59 | 0.0429% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 274 | 42 | 0.0350% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 251 | 47 | 0.0406% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 247 | 41 | 0.0415% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 298 | 28 | 0.0287% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
