Edna: Statistics About The Baby Name Edna
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1991 | * | * | * | 956 | 198 | 0.0097% |
1990 | * | * | * | 956 | 196 | 0.0096% |
1989 | * | * | * | 836 | 226 | 0.0114% |
1987 | * | * | * | 902 | 184 | 0.0098% |
1986 | * | * | * | 937 | 169 | 0.0092% |
1985 | * | * | * | 834 | 194 | 0.0105% |
1984 | * | * | * | 783 | 204 | 0.0113% |
1983 | * | * | * | 729 | 225 | 0.0126% |
1982 | * | * | * | 770 | 212 | 0.0117% |
1981 | * | * | * | 657 | 269 | 0.0151% |
1980 | * | * | * | 645 | 282 | 0.0159% |
1979 | * | * | * | 613 | 287 | 0.0167% |
1978 | * | * | * | 622 | 269 | 0.0164% |
1977 | * | * | * | 567 | 309 | 0.0188% |
1976 | * | * | * | 588 | 275 | 0.0175% |
1975 | * | * | * | 549 | 312 | 0.0200% |
1974 | * | * | * | 532 | 315 | 0.0201% |
1973 | * | * | * | 503 | 341 | 0.0220% |
1972 | * | * | * | 461 | 403 | 0.0250% |
1971 | * | * | * | 459 | 442 | 0.0252% |
1970 | * | * | * | 466 | 444 | 0.0243% |
1969 | * | * | * | 450 | 456 | 0.0259% |
1968 | * | * | * | 422 | 500 | 0.0293% |
1967 | * | * | * | 377 | 582 | 0.0339% |
1966 | * | * | * | 342 | 680 | 0.0387% |
1965 | * | * | * | 341 | 711 | 0.0389% |
1964 | * | * | * | 340 | 785 | 0.0401% |
1963 | * | * | * | 323 | 852 | 0.0429% |
1962 | * | * | * | 294 | 984 | 0.0486% |
1961 | * | * | * | 286 | 1,039 | 0.0501% |
1960 | * | * | * | 270 | 1,107 | 0.0532% |
1959 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,180 | 0.0568% |
1958 | * | * | * | 244 | 1,227 | 0.0595% |
1957 | * | * | * | 241 | 1,239 | 0.0591% |
1956 | * | * | * | 205 | 1,544 | 0.0750% |
1955 | * | * | * | 205 | 1,524 | 0.0761% |
1954 | * | * | * | 188 | 1,684 | 0.0846% |
1953 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,609 | 0.0835% |
1952 | * | * | * | 176 | 1,748 | 0.0919% |
1951 | * | * | * | 170 | 1,795 | 0.0974% |
1950 | * | * | * | 157 | 1,856 | 0.1056% |
1949 | * | * | * | 142 | 2,163 | 0.1233% |
1948 | * | * | * | 137 | 2,103 | 0.1208% |
1947 | * | * | * | 131 | 2,411 | 0.1328% |
1946 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,289 | 0.1422% |
1945 | * | * | * | 120 | 2,146 | 0.1594% |
1944 | * | * | * | 112 | 2,388 | 0.1749% |
1943 | * | * | * | 106 | 2,743 | 0.1916% |
1942 | * | * | * | 99 | 2,774 | 0.1993% |
1941 | * | * | * | 89 | 2,824 | 0.2269% |
1940 | * | * | * | 87 | 2,831 | 0.2397% |
1939 | * | * | * | 81 | 2,902 | 0.2559% |
1938 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,085 | 0.2704% |
1937 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,220 | 0.2924% |
1936 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,302 | 0.3066% |
1935 | * | * | * | 66 | 3,420 | 0.3149% |
1934 | * | * | * | 55 | 3,808 | 0.3520% |
1933 | * | * | * | 55 | 3,722 | 0.3561% |
1932 | * | * | * | 50 | 4,287 | 0.3876% |
1931 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,449 | 0.4036% |
1930 | * | * | * | 51 | 4,753 | 0.4078% |
1929 | * | * | * | 51 | 4,924 | 0.4256% |
1928 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,464 | 0.4575% |
1927 | * | * | * | 40 | 6,083 | 0.4923% |
1926 | * | * | * | 38 | 6,382 | 0.5193% |
1925 | * | * | * | 37 | 6,786 | 0.5375% |
1924 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,415 | 0.5722% |
1923 | * | * | * | 32 | 7,299 | 0.5829% |
1922 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,618 | 0.6108% |
1921 | * | * | * | 27 | 8,286 | 0.6480% |
1920 | * | * | * | 26 | 8,336 | 0.6704% |
1919 | * | * | * | 22 | 8,406 | 0.7157% |
1918 | * | * | * | 23 | 8,690 | 0.7227% |
1917 | * | * | * | 20 | 8,420 | 0.7497% |
1916 | * | * | * | 18 | 8,622 | 0.7947% |
1915 | * | * | * | 20 | 8,126 | 0.7942% |
1914 | * | * | * | 19 | 6,278 | 0.7899% |
1913 | * | * | * | 18 | 5,541 | 0.8485% |
1912 | 943 | 23 | 0.0051% | 16 | 5,116 | 0.8743% |
1911 | * | * | * | 17 | 3,954 | 0.8977% |
1910 | 760 | 16 | 0.0077% | 18 | 3,659 | 0.8742% |
1909 | 621 | 19 | 0.0108% | 16 | 3,422 | 0.9314% |
1908 | 638 | 17 | 0.0102% | 17 | 3,363 | 0.9499% |
1907 | 712 | 14 | 0.0088% | 15 | 3,300 | 0.9788% |
1906 | 952 | 8 | 0.0056% | 15 | 3,010 | 0.9609% |
1905 | 674 | 13 | 0.0091% | 15 | 2,953 | 0.9533% |
1904 | 653 | 13 | 0.0094% | 15 | 2,762 | 0.9446% |
1903 | 861 | 8 | 0.0062% | 15 | 2,667 | 0.9588% |
1902 | 701 | 11 | 0.0083% | 13 | 2,753 | 0.9821% |
1901 | 740 | 9 | 0.0078% | 13 | 2,487 | 0.9782% |
1900 | 707 | 13 | 0.0080% | 12 | 3,103 | 0.9756% |
1899 | 526 | 14 | 0.0122% | 11 | 2,534 | 1.0239% |
1898 | * | * | * | 12 | 2,813 | 1.0260% |
1897 | 691 | 10 | 0.0082% | 12 | 2,567 | 1.0339% |
1896 | * | * | * | 13 | 2,604 | 1.0333% |
1895 | * | * | * | 14 | 2,560 | 1.0359% |
1894 | 987 | 6 | 0.0048% | 15 | 2,458 | 1.0416% |
1893 | 669 | 10 | 0.0083% | 14 | 2,377 | 1.0553% |
1892 | 654 | 11 | 0.0084% | 18 | 2,218 | 0.9861% |
1891 | 721 | 8 | 0.0073% | 18 | 1,963 | 0.9986% |
1890 | 573 | 12 | 0.0100% | 18 | 1,973 | 0.9783% |
1889 | 735 | 8 | 0.0067% | 18 | 1,815 | 0.9591% |
1888 | * | * | * | 22 | 1,687 | 0.8904% |
1887 | * | * | * | 24 | 1,339 | 0.8614% |
1886 | 786 | 7 | 0.0059% | 23 | 1,314 | 0.8546% |
1885 | * | * | * | 30 | 1,077 | 0.7586% |
1884 | 884 | 6 | 0.0049% | 36 | 957 | 0.6955% |
1883 | 823 | 6 | 0.0053% | 41 | 823 | 0.6854% |
1882 | 665 | 9 | 0.0074% | 39 | 783 | 0.6767% |
1881 | 907 | 5 | 0.0046% | 39 | 637 | 0.6443% |
1880 | * | * | * | 45 | 588 | 0.6023% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |