
Edmond: Statistics About The Baby Name Edmond
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1989 | 968 | 111 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1988 | 853 | 124 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1987 | 914 | 106 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
| 1986 | 947 | 93 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
| 1985 | 831 | 116 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1984 | 788 | 121 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
| 1983 | 849 | 106 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
| 1982 | 725 | 143 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1981 | 720 | 144 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1980 | 690 | 158 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
| 1979 | 608 | 199 | 0.0111% | * | * | * |
| 1978 | 598 | 195 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
| 1977 | 658 | 164 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
| 1976 | 749 | 123 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1975 | 714 | 135 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 1974 | 765 | 112 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
| 1973 | 676 | 139 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
| 1972 | 711 | 127 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1971 | 646 | 162 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
| 1970 | 593 | 187 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
| 1969 | 577 | 185 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 561 | 182 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 555 | 181 | 0.0102% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 568 | 177 | 0.0097% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 533 | 208 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 545 | 209 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 502 | 256 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 520 | 232 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 509 | 243 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 483 | 269 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 478 | 266 | 0.0123% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 479 | 267 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 435 | 317 | 0.0145% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 418 | 324 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 395 | 336 | 0.0161% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 411 | 306 | 0.0148% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 377 | 334 | 0.0167% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 402 | 295 | 0.0150% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 368 | 344 | 0.0181% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 380 | 317 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 389 | 297 | 0.0165% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 350 | 363 | 0.0204% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 365 | 355 | 0.0192% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 369 | 309 | 0.0188% | * | * | * |
| 1945 | 361 | 271 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
| 1944 | 367 | 268 | 0.0194% | * | * | * |
| 1943 | 341 | 320 | 0.0221% | * | * | * |
| 1942 | 350 | 299 | 0.0212% | * | * | * |
| 1941 | 347 | 277 | 0.0221% | * | * | * |
| 1940 | 344 | 274 | 0.0231% | * | * | * |
| 1939 | 330 | 281 | 0.0248% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | 347 | 258 | 0.0227% | * | * | * |
| 1937 | 333 | 265 | 0.0243% | * | * | * |
| 1936 | 302 | 309 | 0.0291% | * | * | * |
| 1935 | 327 | 278 | 0.0260% | * | * | * |
| 1934 | 318 | 288 | 0.0272% | * | * | * |
| 1933 | 318 | 287 | 0.0282% | * | * | * |
| 1932 | 322 | 295 | 0.0275% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 308 | 316 | 0.0296% | * | * | * |
| 1930 | 301 | 361 | 0.0320% | * | * | * |
| 1929 | 309 | 319 | 0.0289% | * | * | * |
| 1928 | 279 | 407 | 0.0357% | * | * | * |
| 1927 | 294 | 376 | 0.0324% | * | * | * |
| 1926 | 292 | 377 | 0.0329% | * | * | * |
| 1925 | 287 | 397 | 0.0345% | * | * | * |
| 1924 | 285 | 404 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
| 1923 | 312 | 336 | 0.0297% | * | * | * |
| 1922 | 281 | 390 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
| 1921 | 278 | 399 | 0.0351% | * | * | * |
| 1920 | 264 | 432 | 0.0392% | * | * | * |
| 1919 | 268 | 393 | 0.0387% | * | * | * |
| 1918 | 260 | 431 | 0.0410% | * | * | * |
| 1917 | 267 | 358 | 0.0373% | * | * | * |
| 1916 | 260 | 365 | 0.0395% | * | * | * |
| 1915 | 272 | 322 | 0.0365% | * | * | * |
| 1914 | 266 | 268 | 0.0392% | * | * | * |
| 1913 | 274 | 200 | 0.0373% | * | * | * |
| 1912 | 250 | 199 | 0.0441% | * | * | * |
| 1911 | 272 | 91 | 0.0378% | * | * | * |
| 1910 | 240 | 98 | 0.0471% | * | * | * |
| 1909 | 270 | 68 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
| 1908 | 221 | 87 | 0.0523% | * | * | * |
| 1907 | 253 | 68 | 0.0429% | * | * | * |
| 1906 | 275 | 52 | 0.0361% | * | * | * |
| 1905 | 288 | 48 | 0.0335% | * | * | * |
| 1904 | 262 | 53 | 0.0383% | * | * | * |
| 1903 | 283 | 44 | 0.0340% | * | * | * |
| 1902 | 266 | 50 | 0.0377% | * | * | * |
| 1901 | 268 | 41 | 0.0355% | * | * | * |
| 1900 | 303 | 48 | 0.0295% | * | * | * |
| 1899 | 271 | 41 | 0.0356% | * | * | * |
| 1898 | 280 | 42 | 0.0318% | * | * | * |
| 1897 | 256 | 47 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
| 1896 | 239 | 58 | 0.0449% | * | * | * |
| 1895 | 255 | 50 | 0.0395% | * | * | * |
| 1894 | 244 | 50 | 0.0400% | * | * | * |
| 1893 | 248 | 50 | 0.0413% | * | * | * |
| 1892 | 289 | 40 | 0.0304% | * | * | * |
| 1891 | 252 | 40 | 0.0366% | * | * | * |
| 1890 | 234 | 51 | 0.0426% | * | * | * |
| 1889 | 244 | 44 | 0.0370% | * | * | * |
| 1888 | 273 | 43 | 0.0331% | * | * | * |
| 1887 | 271 | 36 | 0.0329% | * | * | * |
| 1886 | 237 | 50 | 0.0420% | * | * | * |
| 1885 | 277 | 36 | 0.0310% | * | * | * |
| 1884 | 261 | 43 | 0.0350% | * | * | * |
| 1883 | 210 | 52 | 0.0462% | * | * | * |
| 1882 | 274 | 39 | 0.0320% | * | * | * |
| 1881 | 239 | 42 | 0.0388% | * | * | * |
| 1880 | 251 | 44 | 0.0372% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
