
Dixie: Statistics About The Baby Name Dixie
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 1000 | 256 | 0.0140% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 944 | 286 | 0.0148% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 809 | 341 | 0.0176% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 876 | 292 | 0.0153% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 852 | 310 | 0.0161% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 846 | 309 | 0.0161% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 926 | 277 | 0.0143% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 935 | 283 | 0.0141% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 964 | 275 | 0.0134% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 923 | 287 | 0.0138% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 966 | 151 | 0.0084% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 891 | 170 | 0.0096% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 988 | 139 | 0.0085% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 805 | 186 | 0.0113% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 806 | 172 | 0.0110% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 724 | 203 | 0.0130% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 763 | 183 | 0.0117% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 743 | 187 | 0.0120% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 733 | 191 | 0.0118% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 877 | 152 | 0.0087% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 844 | 160 | 0.0087% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 751 | 182 | 0.0103% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 795 | 159 | 0.0093% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 788 | 159 | 0.0093% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 650 | 220 | 0.0125% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 680 | 209 | 0.0114% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 552 | 323 | 0.0165% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 522 | 348 | 0.0175% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 509 | 363 | 0.0179% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 496 | 381 | 0.0184% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 457 | 457 | 0.0220% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 433 | 490 | 0.0236% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 421 | 495 | 0.0240% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 367 | 609 | 0.0290% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 348 | 626 | 0.0304% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 334 | 652 | 0.0325% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 310 | 743 | 0.0373% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 266 | 938 | 0.0487% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 291 | 774 | 0.0407% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 286 | 752 | 0.0408% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 296 | 684 | 0.0389% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 262 | 851 | 0.0485% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 256 | 864 | 0.0496% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 228 | 1,060 | 0.0584% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 228 | 989 | 0.0614% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 217 | 883 | 0.0656% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 209 | 943 | 0.0691% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,040 | 0.0726% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 192 | 1,063 | 0.0764% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 180 | 1,043 | 0.0838% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 171 | 1,168 | 0.0989% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 169 | 1,175 | 0.1036% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 167 | 1,230 | 0.1078% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,160 | 0.1053% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,105 | 0.1026% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 188 | 930 | 0.0856% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 215 | 831 | 0.0768% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 239 | 646 | 0.0618% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 247 | 628 | 0.0568% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 242 | 620 | 0.0562% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 291 | 512 | 0.0439% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 343 | 357 | 0.0309% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 342 | 386 | 0.0323% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 349 | 371 | 0.0300% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 350 | 366 | 0.0298% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 368 | 341 | 0.0270% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 339 | 389 | 0.0300% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 366 | 330 | 0.0264% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 372 | 305 | 0.0245% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 377 | 320 | 0.0250% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 363 | 325 | 0.0261% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 368 | 307 | 0.0261% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 352 | 350 | 0.0291% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 395 | 255 | 0.0227% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 408 | 234 | 0.0216% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 422 | 206 | 0.0201% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 416 | 163 | 0.0205% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 390 | 154 | 0.0236% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 409 | 129 | 0.0220% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 425 | 92 | 0.0209% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 428 | 86 | 0.0205% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 391 | 87 | 0.0237% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 419 | 74 | 0.0209% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 435 | 67 | 0.0199% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 408 | 70 | 0.0223% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 465 | 53 | 0.0171% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 465 | 50 | 0.0171% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 422 | 57 | 0.0205% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 455 | 48 | 0.0171% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 540 | 32 | 0.0126% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 455 | 55 | 0.0173% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 434 | 45 | 0.0182% |
| 1898 | 906 | 7 | 0.0053% | 444 | 48 | 0.0175% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 498 | 34 | 0.0137% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 457 | 40 | 0.0159% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 524 | 32 | 0.0129% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 452 | 38 | 0.0161% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 489 | 31 | 0.0138% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 454 | 36 | 0.0160% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 477 | 29 | 0.0148% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 397 | 41 | 0.0203% |
| 1889 | 901 | 6 | 0.0050% | 389 | 39 | 0.0206% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 396 | 38 | 0.0201% |
| 1887 | 967 | 5 | 0.0046% | 403 | 29 | 0.0187% |
| 1886 | 783 | 7 | 0.0059% | 464 | 22 | 0.0143% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 432 | 24 | 0.0169% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 386 | 27 | 0.0196% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 487 | 16 | 0.0133% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 408 | 20 | 0.0173% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 547 | 10 | 0.0101% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 437 | 15 | 0.0154% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
