Dayton: Statistics About The Baby Name Dayton
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2020 | 977 | 218 | 0.0118% | * | * | * |
2019 | 919 | 237 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
2018 | 843 | 261 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
2017 | 842 | 261 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
2016 | 889 | 244 | 0.0121% | * | * | * |
2015 | 767 | 309 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
2014 | 702 | 345 | 0.0170% | * | * | * |
2013 | 700 | 336 | 0.0168% | * | * | * |
2012 | 603 | 416 | 0.0207% | * | * | * |
2011 | 610 | 393 | 0.0195% | * | * | * |
2010 | 584 | 426 | 0.0209% | * | * | * |
2009 | 521 | 511 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
2008 | 484 | 564 | 0.0262% | * | * | * |
2007 | 512 | 507 | 0.0233% | * | * | * |
2006 | 540 | 460 | 0.0213% | * | * | * |
2005 | 532 | 448 | 0.0215% | * | * | * |
2004 | 504 | 478 | 0.0230% | * | * | * |
2003 | 503 | 484 | 0.0232% | * | * | * |
2002 | 499 | 461 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
2001 | 505 | 451 | 0.0219% | * | * | * |
2000 | 562 | 370 | 0.0178% | * | * | * |
1999 | 562 | 355 | 0.0175% | * | * | * |
1998 | 557 | 353 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1997 | 621 | 278 | 0.0139% | * | * | * |
1996 | 623 | 278 | 0.0139% | * | * | * |
1995 | 707 | 224 | 0.0112% | * | * | * |
1994 | 751 | 195 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1993 | 848 | 156 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
1992 | 985 | 121 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1990 | 881 | 136 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1953 | 967 | 55 | 0.0028% | * | * | * |
1952 | 944 | 57 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1951 | 963 | 53 | 0.0028% | * | * | * |
1948 | 963 | 52 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1947 | 949 | 55 | 0.0030% | * | * | * |
1946 | 982 | 47 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1945 | 903 | 50 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1944 | 905 | 49 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1943 | 879 | 57 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1942 | 882 | 56 | 0.0040% | * | * | * |
1941 | 899 | 50 | 0.0040% | * | * | * |
1940 | 941 | 46 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1939 | 708 | 71 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1938 | 919 | 47 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1937 | 782 | 62 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1936 | 790 | 60 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1935 | 815 | 58 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1934 | 880 | 51 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1933 | 785 | 61 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1932 | 736 | 72 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1931 | 763 | 66 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1930 | 866 | 58 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1929 | 862 | 59 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1928 | 857 | 60 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1927 | 774 | 72 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1926 | 783 | 69 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1925 | 682 | 89 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1924 | 745 | 80 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1923 | 693 | 87 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1922 | 759 | 77 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1921 | 761 | 77 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1920 | 684 | 87 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1919 | 655 | 88 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1918 | 679 | 84 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1917 | 751 | 69 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1916 | 759 | 65 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1915 | 693 | 71 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
1914 | 755 | 49 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1913 | 715 | 42 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1911 | 934 | 13 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1910 | 788 | 15 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1907 | 884 | 10 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1904 | 823 | 9 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1901 | 977 | 6 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1899 | 960 | 6 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1898 | 757 | 9 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1896 | 916 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1895 | 703 | 10 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1894 | 573 | 13 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1893 | 784 | 8 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1892 | 984 | 6 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1891 | 787 | 7 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
1890 | 679 | 9 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
1888 | 835 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1887 | 699 | 8 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1886 | 871 | 6 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1885 | 657 | 9 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1882 | 771 | 7 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1880 | 697 | 8 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |