Darnell: Statistics About The Baby Name Darnell
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2012 | 982 | 201 | 0.0100% | * | * | * |
2011 | 880 | 235 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
2010 | 889 | 232 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
2009 | 791 | 282 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
2008 | 730 | 311 | 0.0145% | * | * | * |
2007 | 710 | 321 | 0.0147% | * | * | * |
2006 | 711 | 301 | 0.0140% | * | * | * |
2005 | 719 | 276 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
2004 | 707 | 267 | 0.0128% | * | * | * |
2003 | 677 | 285 | 0.0136% | * | * | * |
2002 | 691 | 262 | 0.0127% | * | * | * |
2001 | 687 | 262 | 0.0127% | * | * | * |
2000 | 655 | 274 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
1999 | 601 | 312 | 0.0153% | * | * | * |
1998 | 556 | 353 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1997 | 551 | 354 | 0.0177% | * | * | * |
1996 | 507 | 411 | 0.0205% | * | * | * |
1995 | 516 | 393 | 0.0196% | * | * | * |
1994 | 468 | 466 | 0.0229% | * | * | * |
1993 | 475 | 442 | 0.0214% | * | * | * |
1992 | 419 | 531 | 0.0253% | * | * | * |
1991 | 404 | 563 | 0.0266% | * | * | * |
1990 | 353 | 679 | 0.0316% | * | * | * |
1989 | 348 | 659 | 0.0315% | * | * | * |
1988 | 328 | 652 | 0.0327% | * | * | * |
1987 | 312 | 683 | 0.0351% | * | * | * |
1986 | 296 | 693 | 0.0361% | * | * | * |
1985 | 305 | 672 | 0.0350% | * | * | * |
1984 | 279 | 740 | 0.0395% | * | * | * |
1983 | 306 | 643 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
1982 | 344 | 537 | 0.0285% | * | * | * |
1981 | 358 | 490 | 0.0264% | * | * | * |
1980 | 349 | 515 | 0.0278% | * | * | * |
1979 | 353 | 496 | 0.0277% | * | * | * |
1978 | 314 | 566 | 0.0332% | * | * | * |
1977 | 345 | 517 | 0.0303% | * | * | * |
1976 | 352 | 473 | 0.0290% | * | * | * |
1975 | 365 | 453 | 0.0280% | * | * | * |
1974 | 367 | 428 | 0.0263% | * | * | * |
1973 | 357 | 467 | 0.0290% | * | * | * |
1972 | 359 | 469 | 0.0280% | * | * | * |
1971 | 369 | 472 | 0.0260% | * | * | * |
1970 | 371 | 482 | 0.0253% | * | * | * |
1969 | 373 | 439 | 0.0240% | * | * | * |
1968 | 395 | 388 | 0.0219% | * | * | * |
1967 | 382 | 388 | 0.0218% | * | * | * |
1966 | 399 | 353 | 0.0194% | * | * | * |
1965 | 422 | 341 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
1964 | 410 | 385 | 0.0190% | * | * | * |
1963 | 423 | 359 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1962 | 424 | 356 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
1961 | 423 | 350 | 0.0163% | * | * | * |
1960 | 446 | 327 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
1959 | 418 | 359 | 0.0166% | * | * | * |
1958 | 396 | 387 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
1957 | 418 | 349 | 0.0160% | * | * | * |
1956 | 431 | 306 | 0.0143% | * | * | * |
1955 | 396 | 335 | 0.0161% | * | * | * |
1954 | 418 | 294 | 0.0142% | * | * | * |
1953 | 426 | 270 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
1952 | 420 | 273 | 0.0138% | * | * | * |
1951 | 460 | 217 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
1950 | 507 | 174 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1949 | 626 | 119 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1948 | 655 | 107 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1947 | 863 | 65 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1946 | 744 | 78 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1945 | 852 | 54 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1944 | 881 | 52 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1941 | 953 | 45 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1939 | 984 | 42 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |