
Damon: Statistics About The Baby Name Damon
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | 454 | 686 | 0.0372% | * | * | * |
| 2023 | 424 | 742 | 0.0405% | * | * | * |
| 2022 | 424 | 742 | 0.0398% | * | * | * |
| 2021 | 424 | 723 | 0.0389% | * | * | * |
| 2020 | 428 | 690 | 0.0374% | * | * | * |
| 2019 | 459 | 647 | 0.0339% | * | * | * |
| 2018 | 427 | 715 | 0.0371% | * | * | * |
| 2017 | 436 | 704 | 0.0359% | * | * | * |
| 2016 | 442 | 696 | 0.0345% | * | * | * |
| 2015 | 427 | 711 | 0.0351% | * | * | * |
| 2014 | 407 | 755 | 0.0372% | * | * | * |
| 2013 | 379 | 790 | 0.0395% | * | * | * |
| 2012 | 406 | 709 | 0.0353% | * | * | * |
| 2011 | 414 | 675 | 0.0335% | * | * | * |
| 2010 | 419 | 661 | 0.0325% | * | * | * |
| 2009 | 519 | 513 | 0.0245% | * | * | * |
| 2008 | 472 | 579 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
| 2007 | 428 | 663 | 0.0304% | * | * | * |
| 2006 | 386 | 768 | 0.0356% | * | * | * |
| 2005 | 322 | 991 | 0.0475% | * | * | * |
| 2004 | 314 | 976 | 0.0469% | * | * | * |
| 2003 | 297 | 1,018 | 0.0488% | * | * | * |
| 2002 | 291 | 1,021 | 0.0496% | * | * | * |
| 2001 | 288 | 1,038 | 0.0504% | * | * | * |
| 2000 | 290 | 1,041 | 0.0500% | * | * | * |
| 1999 | 285 | 1,020 | 0.0501% | * | * | * |
| 1998 | 274 | 1,048 | 0.0518% | * | * | * |
| 1997 | 284 | 985 | 0.0494% | * | * | * |
| 1996 | 279 | 998 | 0.0499% | * | * | * |
| 1995 | 283 | 958 | 0.0477% | * | * | * |
| 1994 | 293 | 934 | 0.0459% | * | * | * |
| 1993 | 281 | 999 | 0.0484% | * | * | * |
| 1992 | 284 | 1,006 | 0.0480% | * | * | * |
| 1991 | 291 | 888 | 0.0419% | * | * | * |
| 1990 | 321 | 787 | 0.0366% | * | * | * |
| 1989 | 352 | 644 | 0.0308% | * | * | * |
| 1988 | 355 | 583 | 0.0292% | * | * | * |
| 1987 | 365 | 532 | 0.0273% | * | * | * |
| 1986 | 342 | 559 | 0.0292% | * | * | * |
| 1985 | 330 | 594 | 0.0309% | * | * | * |
| 1984 | 323 | 593 | 0.0317% | * | * | * |
| 1983 | 319 | 599 | 0.0322% | * | * | * |
| 1982 | 306 | 639 | 0.0339% | * | * | * |
| 1981 | 293 | 684 | 0.0368% | * | * | * |
| 1980 | 251 | 899 | 0.0486% | * | * | * |
| 1979 | 166 | 1,443 | 0.0807% | * | * | * |
| 1978 | 133 | 1,972 | 0.1157% | * | * | * |
| 1977 | 112 | 2,353 | 0.1379% | * | * | * |
| 1976 | 104 | 2,451 | 0.1504% | * | * | * |
| 1975 | 114 | 2,277 | 0.1406% | * | * | * |
| 1974 | 110 | 2,362 | 0.1451% | * | * | * |
| 1973 | 126 | 2,040 | 0.1266% | * | * | * |
| 1972 | 137 | 1,922 | 0.1149% | * | * | * |
| 1971 | 170 | 1,577 | 0.0869% | * | * | * |
| 1970 | 174 | 1,621 | 0.0852% | * | * | * |
| 1969 | 188 | 1,458 | 0.0797% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 188 | 1,332 | 0.0751% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 226 | 976 | 0.0549% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 241 | 866 | 0.0477% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 280 | 719 | 0.0380% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 298 | 701 | 0.0346% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 281 | 748 | 0.0362% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 358 | 488 | 0.0232% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 367 | 467 | 0.0217% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 418 | 361 | 0.0167% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 432 | 339 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 513 | 227 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 482 | 262 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 493 | 234 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 502 | 215 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 497 | 214 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 539 | 172 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 611 | 133 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 598 | 135 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 628 | 120 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 585 | 132 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 657 | 106 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 577 | 138 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 637 | 102 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1945 | 724 | 71 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1944 | 712 | 76 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
| 1943 | 767 | 72 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
| 1942 | 660 | 95 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1941 | 767 | 65 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1940 | 772 | 64 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
| 1939 | 714 | 70 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | 764 | 64 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
| 1937 | 719 | 70 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
| 1936 | 719 | 69 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
| 1935 | 905 | 49 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
| 1934 | 758 | 66 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1933 | 703 | 73 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
| 1932 | 789 | 65 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 900 | 51 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
| 1930 | 892 | 55 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
| 1929 | 976 | 48 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
| 1928 | 777 | 70 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1927 | 865 | 61 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1926 | 778 | 70 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1925 | 849 | 61 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1924 | 897 | 60 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
| 1923 | 951 | 52 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
| 1922 | 810 | 69 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1920 | 869 | 62 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
| 1919 | 839 | 61 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1918 | 992 | 46 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
| 1916 | 793 | 61 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1915 | 985 | 41 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
| 1912 | 785 | 31 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
| 1909 | 905 | 11 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1907 | 747 | 13 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1906 | 867 | 9 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1905 | 550 | 18 | 0.0126% | * | * | * |
| 1904 | 651 | 13 | 0.0094% | * | * | * |
| 1901 | 975 | 6 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1900 | 800 | 11 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1899 | 878 | 7 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1898 | 905 | 7 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1895 | 809 | 8 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
| 1893 | 850 | 7 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
| 1892 | 651 | 11 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
| 1880 | 840 | 6 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
