Cecil: Statistics About The Baby Name Cecil
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1997 | 973 | 134 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1996 | 884 | 154 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1995 | 914 | 146 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1994 | 836 | 162 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1993 | 741 | 197 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1992 | 743 | 193 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
1991 | 686 | 217 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
1990 | 663 | 231 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
1989 | 649 | 238 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
1988 | 563 | 270 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
1987 | 575 | 249 | 0.0128% | * | * | * |
1986 | 532 | 276 | 0.0144% | * | * | * |
1985 | 531 | 266 | 0.0138% | * | * | * |
1984 | 486 | 295 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
1983 | 480 | 310 | 0.0167% | * | * | * |
1982 | 493 | 296 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
1981 | 464 | 320 | 0.0172% | * | * | * |
1980 | 401 | 407 | 0.0220% | * | * | * |
1979 | 426 | 350 | 0.0196% | * | * | * |
1978 | 415 | 352 | 0.0206% | * | * | * |
1977 | 409 | 368 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
1976 | 412 | 351 | 0.0215% | * | * | * |
1975 | 414 | 350 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
1974 | 372 | 422 | 0.0259% | * | * | * |
1973 | 377 | 414 | 0.0257% | * | * | * |
1972 | 354 | 477 | 0.0285% | * | * | * |
1971 | 345 | 534 | 0.0294% | * | * | * |
1970 | 338 | 561 | 0.0295% | * | * | * |
1969 | 329 | 552 | 0.0302% | * | * | * |
1968 | 320 | 565 | 0.0318% | * | * | * |
1967 | 321 | 539 | 0.0303% | * | * | * |
1966 | 283 | 678 | 0.0373% | * | * | * |
1965 | 275 | 730 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
1964 | 290 | 728 | 0.0359% | * | * | * |
1963 | 267 | 821 | 0.0398% | * | * | * |
1962 | 258 | 884 | 0.0421% | * | * | * |
1961 | 251 | 968 | 0.0450% | * | * | * |
1960 | 256 | 958 | 0.0443% | * | * | * |
1959 | 250 | 1,010 | 0.0467% | * | * | * |
1958 | 249 | 1,006 | 0.0468% | * | * | * |
1957 | 233 | 1,056 | 0.0483% | * | * | * |
1956 | 215 | 1,146 | 0.0535% | * | * | * |
1955 | 206 | 1,216 | 0.0583% | * | * | * |
1954 | 194 | 1,305 | 0.0632% | * | * | * |
1953 | 195 | 1,251 | 0.0627% | * | * | * |
1952 | 185 | 1,334 | 0.0676% | * | * | * |
1951 | 182 | 1,306 | 0.0686% | * | * | * |
1950 | 171 | 1,340 | 0.0737% | * | * | * |
1949 | 172 | 1,316 | 0.0733% | * | * | * |
1948 | 167 | 1,392 | 0.0783% | * | * | * |
1947 | 164 | 1,438 | 0.0777% | * | * | * |
1946 | 159 | 1,400 | 0.0852% | * | * | * |
1945 | 154 | 1,346 | 0.0983% | * | * | * |
1944 | 141 | 1,497 | 0.1081% | * | * | * |
1943 | 132 | 1,687 | 0.1165% | 965 | 67 | 0.0047% |
1942 | 131 | 1,619 | 0.1149% | 963 | 66 | 0.0047% |
1941 | 132 | 1,511 | 0.1206% | 830 | 76 | 0.0061% |
1940 | 117 | 1,588 | 0.1339% | 825 | 74 | 0.0063% |
1939 | 114 | 1,583 | 0.1396% | 838 | 69 | 0.0061% |
1938 | 118 | 1,556 | 0.1370% | 803 | 77 | 0.0067% |
1937 | 114 | 1,629 | 0.1491% | 713 | 91 | 0.0083% |
1936 | 114 | 1,575 | 0.1482% | 724 | 84 | 0.0078% |
1935 | 110 | 1,727 | 0.1617% | 855 | 65 | 0.0060% |
1934 | 111 | 1,586 | 0.1496% | 795 | 71 | 0.0066% |
1933 | 111 | 1,500 | 0.1473% | 806 | 68 | 0.0065% |
1932 | 108 | 1,652 | 0.1540% | 799 | 73 | 0.0066% |
1931 | 102 | 1,770 | 0.1659% | 750 | 79 | 0.0072% |
1930 | 99 | 1,876 | 0.1664% | 726 | 93 | 0.0080% |
1929 | 101 | 1,881 | 0.1701% | 687 | 104 | 0.0090% |
1928 | 97 | 2,006 | 0.1761% | 717 | 98 | 0.0082% |
1927 | 92 | 2,223 | 0.1917% | 674 | 115 | 0.0093% |
1926 | 87 | 2,298 | 0.2008% | 580 | 148 | 0.0120% |
1925 | 87 | 2,285 | 0.1987% | 584 | 152 | 0.0120% |
1924 | 85 | 2,303 | 0.1971% | 558 | 171 | 0.0132% |
1923 | 87 | 2,265 | 0.2000% | 597 | 148 | 0.0118% |
1922 | 85 | 2,330 | 0.2070% | 537 | 173 | 0.0139% |
1921 | 79 | 2,457 | 0.2161% | 586 | 152 | 0.0119% |
1920 | 77 | 2,456 | 0.2231% | 463 | 213 | 0.0171% |
1919 | 78 | 2,302 | 0.2266% | 470 | 200 | 0.0170% |
1918 | 82 | 2,328 | 0.2217% | 429 | 238 | 0.0198% |
1917 | 83 | 2,094 | 0.2183% | 459 | 198 | 0.0176% |
1916 | 79 | 2,185 | 0.2366% | 405 | 240 | 0.0221% |
1915 | 76 | 2,183 | 0.2477% | 429 | 200 | 0.0195% |
1914 | 79 | 1,529 | 0.2239% | 382 | 193 | 0.0243% |
1913 | 74 | 1,277 | 0.2384% | 380 | 162 | 0.0248% |
1912 | 76 | 1,058 | 0.2346% | 396 | 135 | 0.0231% |
1911 | 76 | 558 | 0.2317% | 375 | 116 | 0.0263% |
1910 | 77 | 469 | 0.2253% | 346 | 130 | 0.0311% |
1909 | 72 | 432 | 0.2446% | 339 | 112 | 0.0305% |
1908 | 72 | 397 | 0.2388% | 334 | 114 | 0.0322% |
1907 | 69 | 399 | 0.2517% | 308 | 127 | 0.0377% |
1906 | 68 | 368 | 0.2555% | 320 | 109 | 0.0348% |
1905 | 72 | 347 | 0.2422% | 311 | 116 | 0.0374% |
1904 | 67 | 359 | 0.2592% | 276 | 130 | 0.0445% |
1903 | 66 | 332 | 0.2567% | 308 | 103 | 0.0370% |
1902 | 65 | 354 | 0.2666% | 298 | 112 | 0.0400% |
1901 | 70 | 278 | 0.2404% | 255 | 128 | 0.0503% |
1900 | 76 | 344 | 0.2116% | 289 | 129 | 0.0406% |
1899 | 77 | 256 | 0.2222% | 263 | 117 | 0.0473% |
1898 | 87 | 243 | 0.1839% | 258 | 133 | 0.0485% |
1897 | 84 | 216 | 0.1771% | 240 | 138 | 0.0556% |
1896 | 97 | 200 | 0.1549% | 277 | 108 | 0.0429% |
1895 | 100 | 192 | 0.1516% | 293 | 95 | 0.0384% |
1894 | 102 | 175 | 0.1401% | 310 | 80 | 0.0339% |
1893 | 114 | 147 | 0.1214% | 250 | 112 | 0.0497% |
1892 | 115 | 151 | 0.1148% | 323 | 70 | 0.0311% |
1891 | 126 | 108 | 0.0988% | 351 | 50 | 0.0254% |
1890 | 121 | 120 | 0.1002% | 332 | 58 | 0.0288% |
1889 | 142 | 102 | 0.0857% | 335 | 55 | 0.0291% |
1888 | 158 | 96 | 0.0739% | 415 | 36 | 0.0190% |
1887 | 155 | 80 | 0.0732% | 339 | 40 | 0.0257% |
1886 | 168 | 83 | 0.0697% | 365 | 34 | 0.0221% |
1885 | 154 | 87 | 0.0750% | 365 | 31 | 0.0218% |
1884 | 186 | 73 | 0.0595% | 426 | 22 | 0.0160% |
1883 | 212 | 51 | 0.0453% | 386 | 23 | 0.0192% |
1882 | 225 | 53 | 0.0434% | 362 | 24 | 0.0207% |
1881 | 269 | 35 | 0.0323% | 420 | 16 | 0.0162% |
1880 | 248 | 45 | 0.0380% | 453 | 14 | 0.0143% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |