Cathleen: Statistics About The Baby Name Cathleen
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1987 | * | * | * | 974 | 162 | 0.0087% |
1986 | * | * | * | 905 | 178 | 0.0097% |
1985 | * | * | * | 854 | 188 | 0.0102% |
1984 | * | * | * | 862 | 177 | 0.0098% |
1983 | * | * | * | 856 | 178 | 0.0100% |
1982 | * | * | * | 796 | 202 | 0.0112% |
1981 | * | * | * | 809 | 197 | 0.0110% |
1980 | * | * | * | 837 | 186 | 0.0105% |
1979 | * | * | * | 757 | 213 | 0.0124% |
1978 | * | * | * | 717 | 220 | 0.0134% |
1977 | * | * | * | 621 | 270 | 0.0164% |
1976 | * | * | * | 692 | 214 | 0.0136% |
1975 | * | * | * | 608 | 261 | 0.0167% |
1974 | * | * | * | 524 | 319 | 0.0204% |
1973 | * | * | * | 486 | 368 | 0.0237% |
1972 | * | * | * | 442 | 427 | 0.0265% |
1971 | * | * | * | 400 | 534 | 0.0305% |
1970 | * | * | * | 375 | 635 | 0.0347% |
1969 | * | * | * | 346 | 674 | 0.0383% |
1968 | * | * | * | 365 | 609 | 0.0356% |
1967 | * | * | * | 322 | 733 | 0.0427% |
1966 | * | * | * | 307 | 831 | 0.0474% |
1965 | * | * | * | 301 | 885 | 0.0484% |
1964 | * | * | * | 288 | 1,006 | 0.0514% |
1963 | * | * | * | 327 | 820 | 0.0413% |
1962 | * | * | * | 322 | 849 | 0.0419% |
1961 | * | * | * | 302 | 929 | 0.0448% |
1960 | * | * | * | 304 | 951 | 0.0457% |
1959 | * | * | * | 279 | 1,018 | 0.0490% |
1958 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,153 | 0.0559% |
1957 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,072 | 0.0511% |
1956 | * | * | * | 251 | 1,116 | 0.0542% |
1955 | * | * | * | 267 | 1,009 | 0.0504% |
1954 | * | * | * | 287 | 870 | 0.0437% |
1953 | * | * | * | 292 | 816 | 0.0423% |
1952 | * | * | * | 273 | 876 | 0.0461% |
1951 | * | * | * | 282 | 769 | 0.0417% |
1950 | * | * | * | 280 | 759 | 0.0432% |
1949 | * | * | * | 284 | 734 | 0.0418% |
1948 | * | * | * | 300 | 650 | 0.0373% |
1947 | * | * | * | 332 | 569 | 0.0313% |
1946 | * | * | * | 406 | 356 | 0.0221% |
1945 | * | * | * | 402 | 310 | 0.0230% |
1944 | * | * | * | 423 | 286 | 0.0210% |
1943 | * | * | * | 535 | 199 | 0.0139% |
1942 | * | * | * | 552 | 181 | 0.0130% |
1941 | * | * | * | 603 | 136 | 0.0109% |
1940 | * | * | * | 645 | 117 | 0.0099% |
1939 | * | * | * | 739 | 85 | 0.0075% |
1938 | * | * | * | 876 | 64 | 0.0056% |
1937 | * | * | * | 886 | 61 | 0.0055% |
1935 | * | * | * | 886 | 61 | 0.0056% |
1934 | * | * | * | 907 | 57 | 0.0053% |
1933 | * | * | * | 956 | 51 | 0.0049% |
1932 | * | * | * | 831 | 68 | 0.0061% |
1931 | * | * | * | 995 | 49 | 0.0044% |
1930 | * | * | * | 971 | 57 | 0.0049% |
1929 | * | * | * | 953 | 57 | 0.0049% |
1928 | * | * | * | 908 | 66 | 0.0055% |
1926 | * | * | * | 875 | 72 | 0.0059% |
1925 | * | * | * | 870 | 73 | 0.0058% |
1924 | * | * | * | 893 | 71 | 0.0055% |
1923 | * | * | * | 825 | 79 | 0.0063% |
1922 | * | * | * | 962 | 60 | 0.0048% |
1921 | * | * | * | 997 | 56 | 0.0044% |
1916 | * | * | * | 996 | 48 | 0.0044% |
1912 | * | * | * | 923 | 30 | 0.0051% |
1911 | * | * | * | 898 | 23 | 0.0052% |
1910 | * | * | * | 830 | 27 | 0.0065% |
1906 | * | * | * | 900 | 17 | 0.0054% |
1904 | * | * | * | 855 | 18 | 0.0062% |
1903 | * | * | * | 984 | 13 | 0.0047% |
1902 | * | * | * | 821 | 18 | 0.0064% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |