Camilla: Statistics About The Baby Name Camilla
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 336 | 918 | 0.0525% |
2022 | * | * | * | 313 | 1,009 | 0.0565% |
2021 | * | * | * | 311 | 1,030 | 0.0579% |
2020 | * | * | * | 258 | 1,169 | 0.0663% |
2019 | * | * | * | 271 | 1,216 | 0.0667% |
2018 | * | * | * | 302 | 1,088 | 0.0589% |
2017 | * | * | * | 308 | 1,047 | 0.0558% |
2016 | * | * | * | 342 | 973 | 0.0505% |
2015 | * | * | * | 374 | 868 | 0.0449% |
2014 | * | * | * | 364 | 883 | 0.0455% |
2013 | * | * | * | 399 | 763 | 0.0400% |
2012 | * | * | * | 437 | 706 | 0.0367% |
2011 | * | * | * | 458 | 646 | 0.0336% |
2010 | * | * | * | 508 | 584 | 0.0301% |
2009 | * | * | * | 551 | 547 | 0.0273% |
2008 | * | * | * | 634 | 479 | 0.0233% |
2007 | * | * | * | 726 | 395 | 0.0190% |
2006 | * | * | * | 825 | 322 | 0.0157% |
2005 | * | * | * | 864 | 287 | 0.0144% |
2004 | * | * | * | 906 | 264 | 0.0133% |
2003 | * | * | * | 889 | 269 | 0.0135% |
2001 | * | * | * | 965 | 225 | 0.0114% |
1978 | * | * | * | 983 | 140 | 0.0085% |
1974 | * | * | * | 990 | 123 | 0.0079% |
1973 | * | * | * | 942 | 128 | 0.0082% |
1972 | * | * | * | 920 | 134 | 0.0083% |
1971 | * | * | * | 998 | 125 | 0.0071% |
1970 | * | * | * | 870 | 153 | 0.0084% |
1969 | * | * | * | 763 | 176 | 0.0100% |
1968 | * | * | * | 876 | 138 | 0.0081% |
1967 | * | * | * | 778 | 161 | 0.0094% |
1966 | * | * | * | 828 | 145 | 0.0083% |
1965 | * | * | * | 784 | 159 | 0.0087% |
1964 | * | * | * | 787 | 173 | 0.0088% |
1963 | * | * | * | 807 | 165 | 0.0083% |
1962 | * | * | * | 890 | 141 | 0.0070% |
1961 | * | * | * | 839 | 158 | 0.0076% |
1960 | * | * | * | 838 | 152 | 0.0073% |
1959 | * | * | * | 883 | 138 | 0.0066% |
1958 | * | * | * | 889 | 132 | 0.0064% |
1957 | * | * | * | 989 | 110 | 0.0052% |
1956 | * | * | * | 894 | 125 | 0.0061% |
1955 | * | * | * | 758 | 157 | 0.0078% |
1954 | * | * | * | 785 | 142 | 0.0071% |
1953 | * | * | * | 832 | 123 | 0.0064% |
1952 | * | * | * | 770 | 134 | 0.0070% |
1951 | * | * | * | 745 | 139 | 0.0075% |
1950 | * | * | * | 689 | 155 | 0.0088% |
1949 | * | * | * | 703 | 145 | 0.0083% |
1948 | * | * | * | 661 | 159 | 0.0091% |
1947 | * | * | * | 698 | 147 | 0.0081% |
1946 | * | * | * | 661 | 144 | 0.0089% |
1945 | * | * | * | 651 | 127 | 0.0094% |
1944 | * | * | * | 485 | 219 | 0.0160% |
1943 | * | * | * | 682 | 123 | 0.0086% |
1942 | * | * | * | 669 | 126 | 0.0091% |
1941 | * | * | * | 626 | 128 | 0.0103% |
1940 | * | * | * | 635 | 123 | 0.0104% |
1939 | * | * | * | 595 | 127 | 0.0112% |
1938 | * | * | * | 667 | 107 | 0.0094% |
1937 | * | * | * | 636 | 114 | 0.0104% |
1936 | * | * | * | 671 | 97 | 0.0090% |
1935 | * | * | * | 629 | 107 | 0.0099% |
1934 | * | * | * | 730 | 84 | 0.0078% |
1933 | * | * | * | 619 | 110 | 0.0105% |
1932 | * | * | * | 634 | 112 | 0.0101% |
1931 | * | * | * | 632 | 110 | 0.0100% |
1930 | * | * | * | 643 | 115 | 0.0099% |
1929 | * | * | * | 616 | 124 | 0.0107% |
1928 | * | * | * | 618 | 130 | 0.0109% |
1927 | * | * | * | 714 | 102 | 0.0083% |
1926 | * | * | * | 699 | 107 | 0.0087% |
1925 | * | * | * | 665 | 123 | 0.0097% |
1924 | * | * | * | 637 | 139 | 0.0107% |
1923 | * | * | * | 600 | 147 | 0.0117% |
1922 | * | * | * | 626 | 138 | 0.0111% |
1921 | * | * | * | 640 | 134 | 0.0105% |
1920 | * | * | * | 615 | 134 | 0.0108% |
1919 | * | * | * | 636 | 118 | 0.0100% |
1918 | * | * | * | 536 | 171 | 0.0142% |
1917 | * | * | * | 633 | 116 | 0.0103% |
1916 | * | * | * | 577 | 135 | 0.0124% |
1915 | * | * | * | 564 | 130 | 0.0127% |
1914 | * | * | * | 606 | 88 | 0.0111% |
1913 | * | * | * | 599 | 74 | 0.0113% |
1912 | * | * | * | 576 | 70 | 0.0120% |
1911 | * | * | * | 674 | 41 | 0.0093% |
1910 | * | * | * | 620 | 46 | 0.0110% |
1909 | * | * | * | 587 | 43 | 0.0117% |
1908 | * | * | * | 730 | 28 | 0.0079% |
1907 | * | * | * | 530 | 46 | 0.0136% |
1906 | * | * | * | 633 | 32 | 0.0102% |
1905 | * | * | * | 571 | 37 | 0.0119% |
1904 | * | * | * | 578 | 34 | 0.0116% |
1903 | * | * | * | 558 | 34 | 0.0122% |
1902 | * | * | * | 716 | 23 | 0.0082% |
1901 | * | * | * | 616 | 26 | 0.0102% |
1900 | * | * | * | 533 | 40 | 0.0126% |
1899 | * | * | * | 492 | 36 | 0.0145% |
1898 | * | * | * | 581 | 31 | 0.0113% |
1897 | * | * | * | 662 | 22 | 0.0089% |
1896 | * | * | * | 567 | 29 | 0.0115% |
1895 | * | * | * | 539 | 30 | 0.0121% |
1894 | * | * | * | 598 | 24 | 0.0102% |
1893 | * | * | * | 632 | 21 | 0.0093% |
1892 | * | * | * | 620 | 21 | 0.0093% |
1891 | * | * | * | 612 | 19 | 0.0097% |
1890 | * | * | * | 559 | 22 | 0.0109% |
1889 | * | * | * | 690 | 14 | 0.0074% |
1888 | * | * | * | 666 | 15 | 0.0079% |
1887 | * | * | * | 527 | 18 | 0.0116% |
1886 | * | * | * | 609 | 14 | 0.0091% |
1885 | * | * | * | 559 | 15 | 0.0106% |
1884 | * | * | * | 521 | 16 | 0.0116% |
1883 | * | * | * | 564 | 12 | 0.0100% |
1882 | * | * | * | 531 | 12 | 0.0104% |
1881 | * | * | * | 512 | 11 | 0.0111% |
1880 | * | * | * | 755 | 6 | 0.0061% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |