
Bradford: Statistics About The Baby Name Bradford
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1999 | 957 | 150 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1998 | 834 | 176 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1997 | 821 | 177 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
| 1996 | 727 | 211 | 0.0105% | * | * | * |
| 1995 | 726 | 216 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
| 1994 | 663 | 243 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
| 1993 | 630 | 267 | 0.0129% | * | * | * |
| 1992 | 628 | 270 | 0.0129% | * | * | * |
| 1991 | 612 | 276 | 0.0130% | * | * | * |
| 1990 | 579 | 305 | 0.0142% | * | * | * |
| 1989 | 508 | 353 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
| 1988 | 479 | 368 | 0.0184% | * | * | * |
| 1987 | 416 | 441 | 0.0227% | * | * | * |
| 1986 | 434 | 388 | 0.0202% | * | * | * |
| 1985 | 398 | 452 | 0.0235% | * | * | * |
| 1984 | 371 | 472 | 0.0252% | * | * | * |
| 1983 | 364 | 481 | 0.0259% | * | * | * |
| 1982 | 336 | 558 | 0.0296% | * | * | * |
| 1981 | 317 | 598 | 0.0322% | * | * | * |
| 1980 | 308 | 630 | 0.0340% | * | * | * |
| 1979 | 314 | 614 | 0.0343% | * | * | * |
| 1978 | 301 | 598 | 0.0351% | * | * | * |
| 1977 | 312 | 604 | 0.0354% | * | * | * |
| 1976 | 301 | 594 | 0.0364% | * | * | * |
| 1975 | 323 | 554 | 0.0342% | * | * | * |
| 1974 | 305 | 601 | 0.0369% | * | * | * |
| 1973 | 343 | 493 | 0.0306% | * | * | * |
| 1972 | 357 | 470 | 0.0281% | * | * | * |
| 1971 | 327 | 568 | 0.0313% | * | * | * |
| 1970 | 318 | 611 | 0.0321% | * | * | * |
| 1969 | 311 | 600 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 330 | 534 | 0.0301% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 315 | 559 | 0.0314% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 326 | 525 | 0.0289% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 316 | 582 | 0.0307% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 318 | 600 | 0.0296% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 320 | 611 | 0.0296% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 338 | 533 | 0.0254% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 325 | 579 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 297 | 669 | 0.0309% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 311 | 614 | 0.0284% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 304 | 618 | 0.0287% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 285 | 675 | 0.0309% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 273 | 719 | 0.0336% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 269 | 697 | 0.0334% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 249 | 771 | 0.0373% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 240 | 775 | 0.0388% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 269 | 657 | 0.0333% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 284 | 573 | 0.0301% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 274 | 576 | 0.0317% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 304 | 498 | 0.0277% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 348 | 374 | 0.0210% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 380 | 328 | 0.0177% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 402 | 250 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
| 1945 | 441 | 182 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
| 1944 | 444 | 187 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
| 1943 | 467 | 176 | 0.0122% | * | * | * |
| 1942 | 482 | 160 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
| 1941 | 496 | 137 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
| 1940 | 515 | 126 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
| 1939 | 499 | 128 | 0.0113% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | 570 | 105 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
| 1937 | 505 | 130 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
| 1936 | 573 | 101 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1935 | 602 | 93 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1934 | 602 | 96 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
| 1933 | 643 | 81 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
| 1932 | 661 | 85 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 632 | 88 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1930 | 648 | 90 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
| 1929 | 674 | 82 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1928 | 684 | 85 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1927 | 650 | 95 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1926 | 635 | 99 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1925 | 752 | 76 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1924 | 771 | 76 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
| 1923 | 780 | 72 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
| 1922 | 800 | 70 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1921 | 696 | 87 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1920 | 768 | 74 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1919 | 779 | 69 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1918 | 779 | 70 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1917 | 727 | 72 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1916 | 703 | 72 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
| 1915 | 717 | 68 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1914 | 746 | 50 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1913 | 762 | 38 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
| 1912 | 636 | 43 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1911 | 670 | 22 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
| 1909 | 721 | 15 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
| 1908 | 833 | 11 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1907 | 937 | 9 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
| 1905 | 748 | 11 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1904 | 893 | 8 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
| 1902 | 802 | 9 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1900 | 703 | 13 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
| 1898 | 751 | 9 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1896 | 599 | 13 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
| 1895 | 642 | 11 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1893 | 845 | 7 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
| 1891 | 651 | 9 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1889 | 990 | 5 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
| 1885 | 955 | 5 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
| 1880 | 929 | 5 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
