
Boyd: Statistics About The Baby Name Boyd
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 1982 | 893 | 100 | 0.0053% | * | * | * | 
| 1981 | 912 | 96 | 0.0052% | * | * | * | 
| 1980 | 900 | 98 | 0.0053% | * | * | * | 
| 1979 | 856 | 102 | 0.0057% | * | * | * | 
| 1978 | 853 | 101 | 0.0059% | * | * | * | 
| 1977 | 794 | 115 | 0.0067% | * | * | * | 
| 1976 | 784 | 111 | 0.0068% | * | * | * | 
| 1975 | 707 | 137 | 0.0085% | * | * | * | 
| 1974 | 656 | 150 | 0.0092% | * | * | * | 
| 1973 | 653 | 149 | 0.0092% | * | * | * | 
| 1972 | 643 | 152 | 0.0091% | * | * | * | 
| 1971 | 613 | 185 | 0.0102% | * | * | * | 
| 1970 | 490 | 273 | 0.0144% | * | * | * | 
| 1969 | 483 | 251 | 0.0137% | * | * | * | 
| 1968 | 462 | 272 | 0.0153% | * | * | * | 
| 1967 | 474 | 253 | 0.0142% | * | * | * | 
| 1966 | 472 | 264 | 0.0145% | * | * | * | 
| 1965 | 461 | 285 | 0.0150% | * | * | * | 
| 1964 | 434 | 337 | 0.0166% | * | * | * | 
| 1963 | 432 | 340 | 0.0165% | * | * | * | 
| 1962 | 401 | 407 | 0.0194% | * | * | * | 
| 1961 | 421 | 354 | 0.0164% | * | * | * | 
| 1960 | 409 | 373 | 0.0172% | * | * | * | 
| 1959 | 408 | 376 | 0.0174% | * | * | * | 
| 1958 | 410 | 363 | 0.0169% | * | * | * | 
| 1957 | 391 | 389 | 0.0178% | * | * | * | 
| 1956 | 387 | 376 | 0.0176% | * | * | * | 
| 1955 | 376 | 368 | 0.0176% | * | * | * | 
| 1954 | 389 | 339 | 0.0164% | * | * | * | 
| 1953 | 351 | 392 | 0.0196% | * | * | * | 
| 1952 | 345 | 397 | 0.0201% | * | * | * | 
| 1951 | 361 | 362 | 0.0190% | * | * | * | 
| 1950 | 366 | 342 | 0.0188% | * | * | * | 
| 1949 | 363 | 343 | 0.0191% | * | * | * | 
| 1948 | 356 | 355 | 0.0200% | * | * | * | 
| 1947 | 332 | 427 | 0.0231% | * | * | * | 
| 1946 | 340 | 355 | 0.0216% | * | * | * | 
| 1945 | 336 | 315 | 0.0230% | * | * | * | 
| 1944 | 320 | 349 | 0.0252% | * | * | * | 
| 1943 | 308 | 404 | 0.0279% | * | * | * | 
| 1942 | 309 | 392 | 0.0278% | * | * | * | 
| 1941 | 287 | 408 | 0.0326% | * | * | * | 
| 1940 | 291 | 373 | 0.0315% | * | * | * | 
| 1939 | 291 | 359 | 0.0317% | * | * | * | 
| 1938 | 271 | 412 | 0.0363% | * | * | * | 
| 1937 | 265 | 417 | 0.0382% | * | * | * | 
| 1936 | 285 | 357 | 0.0336% | * | * | * | 
| 1935 | 289 | 350 | 0.0328% | * | * | * | 
| 1934 | 272 | 396 | 0.0373% | * | * | * | 
| 1933 | 260 | 408 | 0.0401% | * | * | * | 
| 1932 | 274 | 396 | 0.0369% | * | * | * | 
| 1931 | 265 | 422 | 0.0395% | * | * | * | 
| 1930 | 271 | 434 | 0.0385% | * | * | * | 
| 1929 | 262 | 454 | 0.0411% | * | * | * | 
| 1928 | 269 | 446 | 0.0391% | * | * | * | 
| 1927 | 271 | 441 | 0.0380% | * | * | * | 
| 1926 | 272 | 433 | 0.0378% | * | * | * | 
| 1925 | 256 | 490 | 0.0426% | * | * | * | 
| 1924 | 266 | 459 | 0.0393% | * | * | * | 
| 1923 | 275 | 425 | 0.0375% | * | * | * | 
| 1922 | 248 | 509 | 0.0452% | * | * | * | 
| 1921 | 267 | 441 | 0.0388% | * | * | * | 
| 1920 | 257 | 456 | 0.0414% | * | * | * | 
| 1919 | 262 | 414 | 0.0408% | * | * | * | 
| 1918 | 256 | 433 | 0.0412% | * | * | * | 
| 1917 | 257 | 388 | 0.0404% | * | * | * | 
| 1916 | 252 | 385 | 0.0417% | * | * | * | 
| 1915 | 264 | 335 | 0.0380% | * | * | * | 
| 1914 | 254 | 286 | 0.0419% | * | * | * | 
| 1913 | 275 | 198 | 0.0370% | * | * | * | 
| 1912 | 268 | 171 | 0.0379% | * | * | * | 
| 1911 | 286 | 85 | 0.0353% | * | * | * | 
| 1910 | 262 | 86 | 0.0413% | * | * | * | 
| 1909 | 269 | 68 | 0.0385% | * | * | * | 
| 1908 | 274 | 61 | 0.0367% | * | * | * | 
| 1907 | 286 | 54 | 0.0341% | * | * | * | 
| 1906 | 266 | 54 | 0.0375% | * | * | * | 
| 1905 | 316 | 40 | 0.0279% | * | * | * | 
| 1904 | 278 | 46 | 0.0332% | * | * | * | 
| 1903 | 294 | 41 | 0.0317% | * | * | * | 
| 1902 | 293 | 42 | 0.0316% | * | * | * | 
| 1901 | 266 | 42 | 0.0363% | * | * | * | 
| 1900 | 261 | 62 | 0.0381% | * | * | * | 
| 1899 | 228 | 53 | 0.0460% | * | * | * | 
| 1898 | 329 | 34 | 0.0257% | * | * | * | 
| 1897 | 300 | 37 | 0.0303% | * | * | * | 
| 1896 | 325 | 34 | 0.0263% | * | * | * | 
| 1895 | 330 | 31 | 0.0245% | * | * | * | 
| 1894 | 256 | 46 | 0.0368% | * | * | * | 
| 1893 | 292 | 35 | 0.0289% | * | * | * | 
| 1892 | 304 | 37 | 0.0281% | * | * | * | 
| 1891 | 309 | 29 | 0.0265% | * | * | * | 
| 1890 | 290 | 35 | 0.0292% | * | * | * | 
| 1889 | 237 | 47 | 0.0395% | * | * | * | 
| 1888 | 281 | 41 | 0.0316% | * | * | * | 
| 1887 | 325 | 26 | 0.0238% | * | * | * | 
| 1886 | 260 | 43 | 0.0361% | * | * | * | 
| 1885 | 263 | 40 | 0.0345% | * | * | * | 
| 1884 | 360 | 24 | 0.0196% | * | * | * | 
| 1883 | 373 | 21 | 0.0187% | * | * | * | 
| 1882 | 319 | 29 | 0.0238% | * | * | * | 
| 1881 | 332 | 24 | 0.0222% | * | * | * | 
| 1880 | 443 | 16 | 0.0135% | * | * | * | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
