Beulah: Statistics About The Baby Name Beulah
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1959 | * | * | * | 973 | 117 | 0.0056% |
1958 | * | * | * | 893 | 131 | 0.0063% |
1957 | * | * | * | 849 | 142 | 0.0068% |
1956 | * | * | * | 844 | 139 | 0.0068% |
1955 | * | * | * | 781 | 151 | 0.0075% |
1954 | * | * | * | 660 | 195 | 0.0098% |
1953 | * | * | * | 670 | 180 | 0.0093% |
1952 | * | * | * | 614 | 203 | 0.0107% |
1951 | * | * | * | 550 | 235 | 0.0127% |
1950 | * | * | * | 481 | 284 | 0.0162% |
1949 | * | * | * | 443 | 322 | 0.0184% |
1948 | * | * | * | 436 | 330 | 0.0190% |
1947 | * | * | * | 425 | 368 | 0.0203% |
1946 | * | * | * | 413 | 347 | 0.0216% |
1945 | * | * | * | 350 | 390 | 0.0290% |
1944 | * | * | * | 314 | 459 | 0.0336% |
1943 | * | * | * | 309 | 509 | 0.0355% |
1942 | * | * | * | 306 | 509 | 0.0366% |
1941 | * | * | * | 271 | 552 | 0.0443% |
1940 | * | * | * | 253 | 622 | 0.0527% |
1939 | * | * | * | 259 | 572 | 0.0504% |
1938 | * | * | * | 237 | 689 | 0.0604% |
1937 | * | * | * | 224 | 721 | 0.0655% |
1936 | * | * | * | 221 | 743 | 0.0690% |
1935 | * | * | * | 202 | 839 | 0.0772% |
1934 | * | * | * | 192 | 927 | 0.0857% |
1933 | * | * | * | 188 | 899 | 0.0860% |
1932 | * | * | * | 184 | 997 | 0.0902% |
1931 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,061 | 0.0962% |
1930 | * | * | * | 167 | 1,211 | 0.1039% |
1929 | * | * | * | 161 | 1,275 | 0.1102% |
1928 | * | * | * | 153 | 1,425 | 0.1193% |
1927 | * | * | * | 146 | 1,649 | 0.1334% |
1926 | * | * | * | 148 | 1,652 | 0.1344% |
1925 | * | * | * | 143 | 1,775 | 0.1406% |
1924 | * | * | * | 138 | 2,008 | 0.1550% |
1923 | * | * | * | 130 | 2,048 | 0.1636% |
1922 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,094 | 0.1679% |
1921 | * | * | * | 117 | 2,312 | 0.1808% |
1920 | * | * | * | 109 | 2,378 | 0.1912% |
1919 | * | * | * | 108 | 2,212 | 0.1883% |
1918 | * | * | * | 104 | 2,369 | 0.1970% |
1917 | * | * | * | 102 | 2,229 | 0.1985% |
1916 | * | * | * | 97 | 2,395 | 0.2207% |
1915 | * | * | * | 95 | 2,266 | 0.2215% |
1914 | * | * | * | 96 | 1,768 | 0.2225% |
1913 | * | * | * | 85 | 1,634 | 0.2502% |
1912 | * | * | * | 80 | 1,606 | 0.2745% |
1911 | * | * | * | 79 | 1,243 | 0.2822% |
1910 | * | * | * | 82 | 1,129 | 0.2697% |
1909 | * | * | * | 80 | 1,050 | 0.2858% |
1908 | * | * | * | 82 | 1,013 | 0.2861% |
1907 | * | * | * | 73 | 1,091 | 0.3236% |
1906 | * | * | * | 75 | 979 | 0.3125% |
1905 | * | * | * | 77 | 967 | 0.3122% |
1904 | * | * | * | 72 | 983 | 0.3362% |
1903 | * | * | * | 72 | 920 | 0.3308% |
1902 | * | * | * | 77 | 872 | 0.3111% |
1901 | * | * | * | 74 | 859 | 0.3379% |
1900 | * | * | * | 78 | 974 | 0.3062% |
1899 | * | * | * | 76 | 770 | 0.3111% |
1898 | * | * | * | 82 | 783 | 0.2856% |
1897 | * | * | * | 81 | 688 | 0.2771% |
1896 | * | * | * | 77 | 750 | 0.2976% |
1895 | * | * | * | 74 | 760 | 0.3075% |
1894 | * | * | * | 79 | 675 | 0.2860% |
1893 | * | * | * | 80 | 622 | 0.2761% |
1892 | 971 | 6 | 0.0046% | 77 | 638 | 0.2836% |
1891 | * | * | * | 81 | 526 | 0.2676% |
1890 | * | * | * | 79 | 572 | 0.2836% |
1889 | * | * | * | 81 | 498 | 0.2632% |
1888 | * | * | * | 95 | 426 | 0.2248% |
1887 | * | * | * | 90 | 355 | 0.2284% |
1886 | * | * | * | 98 | 345 | 0.2244% |
1885 | * | * | * | 96 | 309 | 0.2177% |
1884 | * | * | * | 113 | 233 | 0.1693% |
1883 | * | * | * | 107 | 217 | 0.1807% |
1882 | * | * | * | 112 | 190 | 0.1642% |
1881 | * | * | * | 112 | 162 | 0.1639% |
1880 | * | * | * | 123 | 131 | 0.1342% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |