
Bessie: Statistics About The Baby Name Bessie
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 957 | 131 | 0.0084% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 993 | 119 | 0.0077% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 866 | 148 | 0.0092% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 923 | 140 | 0.0080% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 847 | 159 | 0.0087% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 820 | 157 | 0.0089% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 792 | 160 | 0.0094% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 713 | 187 | 0.0109% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 683 | 204 | 0.0116% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 580 | 272 | 0.0149% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 579 | 291 | 0.0149% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 574 | 294 | 0.0148% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 536 | 331 | 0.0163% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 560 | 315 | 0.0152% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 493 | 385 | 0.0185% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 490 | 394 | 0.0190% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 450 | 445 | 0.0216% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 435 | 465 | 0.0222% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 396 | 517 | 0.0251% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 382 | 533 | 0.0266% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 330 | 654 | 0.0329% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 325 | 643 | 0.0334% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 297 | 731 | 0.0384% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 284 | 759 | 0.0412% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 271 | 793 | 0.0451% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 241 | 947 | 0.0540% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 236 | 996 | 0.0572% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 233 | 1,019 | 0.0561% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 225 | 1,022 | 0.0635% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,066 | 0.0792% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,120 | 0.0820% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 190 | 1,141 | 0.0797% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 176 | 1,266 | 0.0910% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 173 | 1,175 | 0.0944% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 161 | 1,299 | 0.1100% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 158 | 1,363 | 0.1202% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 155 | 1,421 | 0.1245% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 143 | 1,548 | 0.1406% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 136 | 1,641 | 0.1524% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 129 | 1,744 | 0.1606% | 
| 1934 | * | * | * | 128 | 1,834 | 0.1695% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 117 | 1,882 | 0.1801% | 
| 1932 | * | * | * | 117 | 2,093 | 0.1893% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 113 | 2,119 | 0.1922% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 110 | 2,374 | 0.2037% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,380 | 0.2057% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 100 | 2,672 | 0.2237% | 
| 1927 | * | * | * | 88 | 2,978 | 0.2410% | 
| 1926 | * | * | * | 89 | 3,038 | 0.2472% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 87 | 3,269 | 0.2590% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 86 | 3,404 | 0.2627% | 
| 1923 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,384 | 0.2703% | 
| 1922 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,452 | 0.2768% | 
| 1921 | * | * | * | 75 | 3,673 | 0.2873% | 
| 1920 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,893 | 0.3131% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,108 | 0.3498% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 61 | 4,096 | 0.3406% | 
| 1917 | * | * | * | 61 | 3,923 | 0.3493% | 
| 1916 | * | * | * | 56 | 4,121 | 0.3798% | 
| 1915 | * | * | * | 57 | 3,884 | 0.3796% | 
| 1914 | * | * | * | 55 | 3,258 | 0.4099% | 
| 1913 | * | * | * | 47 | 2,937 | 0.4498% | 
| 1912 | * | * | * | 43 | 2,826 | 0.4829% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 40 | 2,269 | 0.5152% | 
| 1910 | 936 | 12 | 0.0058% | 37 | 2,387 | 0.5703% | 
| 1909 | 900 | 11 | 0.0062% | 35 | 2,274 | 0.6189% | 
| 1908 | * | * | * | 34 | 2,198 | 0.6208% | 
| 1907 | 820 | 11 | 0.0069% | 30 | 2,310 | 0.6851% | 
| 1906 | * | * | * | 21 | 2,395 | 0.7646% | 
| 1905 | 843 | 9 | 0.0063% | 20 | 2,445 | 0.7893% | 
| 1904 | * | * | * | 21 | 2,341 | 0.8006% | 
| 1903 | 581 | 15 | 0.0116% | 21 | 2,338 | 0.8406% | 
| 1902 | 943 | 7 | 0.0053% | 19 | 2,448 | 0.8733% | 
| 1901 | 638 | 11 | 0.0095% | 21 | 2,183 | 0.8587% | 
| 1900 | 793 | 11 | 0.0068% | 15 | 3,044 | 0.9570% | 
| 1899 | * | * | * | 19 | 2,280 | 0.9212% | 
| 1898 | * | * | * | 16 | 2,647 | 0.9655% | 
| 1897 | 952 | 6 | 0.0049% | 17 | 2,407 | 0.9695% | 
| 1896 | 647 | 12 | 0.0093% | 18 | 2,435 | 0.9662% | 
| 1895 | 885 | 7 | 0.0055% | 15 | 2,543 | 1.0291% | 
| 1894 | 522 | 15 | 0.0120% | 13 | 2,520 | 1.0678% | 
| 1893 | 776 | 8 | 0.0066% | 15 | 2,352 | 1.0442% | 
| 1892 | 605 | 12 | 0.0091% | 13 | 2,541 | 1.1297% | 
| 1891 | 712 | 8 | 0.0073% | 12 | 2,323 | 1.1817% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 11 | 2,370 | 1.1752% | 
| 1889 | 805 | 7 | 0.0059% | 9 | 2,342 | 1.2376% | 
| 1888 | 580 | 12 | 0.0092% | 10 | 2,279 | 1.2028% | 
| 1887 | 943 | 5 | 0.0046% | 13 | 1,838 | 1.1825% | 
| 1886 | 980 | 5 | 0.0042% | 12 | 1,791 | 1.1649% | 
| 1885 | 771 | 7 | 0.0060% | 13 | 1,588 | 1.1186% | 
| 1884 | 985 | 5 | 0.0041% | 15 | 1,451 | 1.0545% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 18 | 1,241 | 1.0335% | 
| 1882 | 656 | 9 | 0.0074% | 18 | 1,144 | 0.9887% | 
| 1881 | 658 | 8 | 0.0074% | 22 | 903 | 0.9133% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 23 | 794 | 0.8134% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
