
Anna: Statistics About The Baby Name Anna
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,700 | 0.1528% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 79 | 2,918 | 0.1668% |
| 2022 | * | * | * | 83 | 2,944 | 0.1650% |
| 2021 | * | * | * | 84 | 3,044 | 0.1711% |
| 2020 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,496 | 0.1984% |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,807 | 0.2089% |
| 2018 | * | * | * | 54 | 4,145 | 0.2245% |
| 2017 | * | * | * | 53 | 4,520 | 0.2411% |
| 2016 | * | * | * | 49 | 4,775 | 0.2476% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 44 | 5,094 | 0.2632% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 34 | 5,639 | 0.2909% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 35 | 5,315 | 0.2784% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 35 | 5,552 | 0.2889% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 38 | 5,601 | 0.2917% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 28 | 6,242 | 0.3215% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 29 | 6,706 | 0.3350% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,146 | 0.3477% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 25 | 7,752 | 0.3720% |
| 2006 | * | * | * | 23 | 8,442 | 0.4104% |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 23 | 8,885 | 0.4460% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 20 | 9,343 | 0.4704% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 21 | 9,376 | 0.4702% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 20 | 10,333 | 0.5256% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 19 | 10,518 | 0.5329% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 22 | 10,547 | 0.5301% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 29 | 9,064 | 0.4667% |
| 1998 | * | * | * | 31 | 8,347 | 0.4315% |
| 1997 | * | * | * | 33 | 8,314 | 0.4362% |
| 1996 | * | * | * | 33 | 8,536 | 0.4459% |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 31 | 8,531 | 0.4446% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 41 | 7,502 | 0.3854% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 47 | 6,785 | 0.3446% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 49 | 6,821 | 0.3407% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 46 | 7,083 | 0.3487% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 45 | 7,270 | 0.3544% |
| 1989 | * | * | * | 51 | 6,863 | 0.3448% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 54 | 6,383 | 0.3327% |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 52 | 6,144 | 0.3283% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,868 | 0.3186% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 54 | 5,869 | 0.3184% |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 57 | 5,292 | 0.2940% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 55 | 5,207 | 0.2914% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 56 | 5,255 | 0.2902% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 54 | 5,176 | 0.2899% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 55 | 5,013 | 0.2820% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,649 | 0.2701% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 65 | 4,161 | 0.2535% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,841 | 0.2338% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,571 | 0.2274% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 79 | 3,564 | 0.2285% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,603 | 0.2302% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 88 | 3,494 | 0.2250% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 87 | 3,433 | 0.2130% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 106 | 3,565 | 0.2036% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 102 | 3,786 | 0.2068% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 99 | 3,713 | 0.2107% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 99 | 3,560 | 0.2083% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 91 | 3,714 | 0.2164% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 95 | 3,664 | 0.2088% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 96 | 3,915 | 0.2143% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 97 | 4,281 | 0.2188% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 102 | 4,246 | 0.2136% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 100 | 4,439 | 0.2191% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 100 | 4,655 | 0.2244% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 104 | 4,645 | 0.2234% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 99 | 4,873 | 0.2345% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 103 | 4,652 | 0.2254% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 105 | 4,438 | 0.2117% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 104 | 4,378 | 0.2127% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 105 | 4,097 | 0.2045% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 105 | 3,989 | 0.2004% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 98 | 3,836 | 0.1990% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 101 | 3,716 | 0.1954% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 94 | 3,851 | 0.2089% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 93 | 3,811 | 0.2168% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 91 | 3,901 | 0.2224% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 89 | 4,034 | 0.2317% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 92 | 4,234 | 0.2331% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 87 | 4,002 | 0.2486% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 75 | 3,597 | 0.2672% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,629 | 0.2658% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 64 | 4,240 | 0.2961% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,492 | 0.3228% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 56 | 4,428 | 0.3557% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,708 | 0.3986% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 43 | 4,923 | 0.4341% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 40 | 5,139 | 0.4504% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 38 | 5,453 | 0.4951% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 36 | 5,727 | 0.5318% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 34 | 6,158 | 0.5669% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 31 | 6,674 | 0.6170% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,062 | 0.6756% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 24 | 7,930 | 0.7171% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 25 | 8,411 | 0.7630% |
| 1930 | 942 | 51 | 0.0045% | 23 | 9,073 | 0.7785% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 20 | 9,738 | 0.8417% |
| 1928 | 936 | 52 | 0.0046% | 16 | 10,548 | 0.8832% |
| 1927 | 991 | 50 | 0.0043% | 16 | 11,207 | 0.9069% |
| 1926 | 996 | 48 | 0.0042% | 15 | 11,704 | 0.9523% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 13 | 12,253 | 0.9706% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 13 | 13,072 | 1.0088% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 13 | 12,843 | 1.0257% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 12 | 13,404 | 1.0748% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 11 | 14,470 | 1.1317% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 10 | 14,568 | 1.1715% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 10 | 14,504 | 1.2349% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 10 | 15,671 | 1.3033% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 7 | 15,141 | 1.3482% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 7 | 15,225 | 1.4032% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 7 | 15,109 | 1.4768% |
| 1914 | 855 | 40 | 0.0059% | 6 | 11,846 | 1.4905% |
| 1913 | 873 | 31 | 0.0058% | 7 | 9,662 | 1.4796% |
| 1912 | 817 | 29 | 0.0064% | 7 | 8,566 | 1.4639% |
| 1911 | 708 | 20 | 0.0083% | 6 | 6,728 | 1.5276% |
| 1910 | 634 | 21 | 0.0101% | 6 | 6,419 | 1.5336% |
| 1909 | 531 | 24 | 0.0136% | 6 | 5,788 | 1.5754% |
| 1908 | 880 | 10 | 0.0060% | 5 | 5,855 | 1.6537% |
| 1907 | 539 | 20 | 0.0126% | 4 | 5,571 | 1.6523% |
| 1906 | 674 | 13 | 0.0090% | 4 | 5,497 | 1.7549% |
| 1905 | 492 | 21 | 0.0147% | 4 | 5,422 | 1.7503% |
| 1904 | 566 | 16 | 0.0116% | 3 | 5,329 | 1.8224% |
| 1903 | 506 | 18 | 0.0139% | 3 | 5,096 | 1.8321% |
| 1902 | 536 | 16 | 0.0121% | 3 | 5,288 | 1.8864% |
| 1901 | 454 | 18 | 0.0156% | 3 | 4,922 | 1.9360% |
| 1900 | 455 | 25 | 0.0154% | 3 | 6,118 | 1.9235% |
| 1899 | 384 | 23 | 0.0200% | 2 | 5,115 | 2.0667% |
| 1898 | 346 | 31 | 0.0235% | 2 | 5,773 | 2.1057% |
| 1897 | 441 | 19 | 0.0156% | 2 | 5,429 | 2.1867% |
| 1896 | 502 | 17 | 0.0132% | 2 | 5,860 | 2.3253% |
| 1895 | 478 | 18 | 0.0142% | 2 | 5,949 | 2.4074% |
| 1894 | 421 | 20 | 0.0160% | 2 | 5,565 | 2.3581% |
| 1893 | 449 | 17 | 0.0140% | 2 | 5,696 | 2.5288% |
| 1892 | 423 | 20 | 0.0152% | 2 | 5,542 | 2.4639% |
| 1891 | 456 | 15 | 0.0137% | 2 | 5,099 | 2.5938% |
| 1890 | 405 | 20 | 0.0167% | 2 | 5,233 | 2.5948% |
| 1889 | 371 | 23 | 0.0193% | 2 | 5,062 | 2.6750% |
| 1888 | 360 | 26 | 0.0200% | 2 | 4,983 | 2.6300% |
| 1887 | 517 | 12 | 0.0110% | 2 | 4,226 | 2.7188% |
| 1886 | 472 | 15 | 0.0126% | 2 | 4,283 | 2.7857% |
| 1885 | 399 | 20 | 0.0172% | 2 | 3,994 | 2.8134% |
| 1884 | 400 | 20 | 0.0163% | 2 | 3,860 | 2.8053% |
| 1883 | 448 | 16 | 0.0142% | 2 | 3,306 | 2.7532% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 2 | 3,142 | 2.7155% |
| 1881 | 431 | 16 | 0.0148% | 2 | 2,698 | 2.7288% |
| 1880 | 529 | 12 | 0.0101% | 2 | 2,604 | 2.6675% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
