Amber: Statistics About The Baby Name Amber
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 575 | 517 | 0.0296% |
2022 | * | * | * | 542 | 566 | 0.0317% |
2021 | * | * | * | 534 | 571 | 0.0321% |
2020 | * | * | * | 514 | 586 | 0.0333% |
2019 | * | * | * | 482 | 647 | 0.0355% |
2018 | * | * | * | 471 | 658 | 0.0356% |
2017 | * | * | * | 401 | 776 | 0.0414% |
2016 | * | * | * | 374 | 869 | 0.0451% |
2015 | * | * | * | 334 | 969 | 0.0501% |
2014 | * | * | * | 309 | 1,049 | 0.0541% |
2013 | * | * | * | 288 | 1,099 | 0.0576% |
2012 | * | * | * | 260 | 1,226 | 0.0638% |
2011 | * | * | * | 260 | 1,216 | 0.0633% |
2010 | * | * | * | 224 | 1,394 | 0.0718% |
2009 | * | * | * | 186 | 1,748 | 0.0873% |
2008 | * | * | * | 165 | 2,033 | 0.0989% |
2007 | * | * | * | 146 | 2,361 | 0.1133% |
2006 | * | * | * | 136 | 2,544 | 0.1237% |
2005 | * | * | * | 102 | 3,076 | 0.1544% |
2004 | * | * | * | 88 | 3,580 | 0.1802% |
2003 | * | * | * | 74 | 4,085 | 0.2048% |
2002 | * | * | * | 65 | 4,704 | 0.2393% |
2001 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,549 | 0.2812% |
2000 | * | * | * | 46 | 6,161 | 0.3096% |
1999 | * | * | * | 41 | 6,823 | 0.3513% |
1998 | * | * | * | 37 | 7,915 | 0.4091% |
1997 | * | * | * | 29 | 8,899 | 0.4669% |
1996 | * | * | * | 27 | 9,760 | 0.5098% |
1995 | * | * | * | 22 | 10,954 | 0.5708% |
1994 | * | * | * | 21 | 12,332 | 0.6335% |
1993 | * | * | * | 17 | 14,053 | 0.7138% |
1992 | * | * | * | 19 | 13,913 | 0.6949% |
1991 | * | * | * | 16 | 14,985 | 0.7377% |
1990 | * | * | * | 15 | 15,853 | 0.7727% |
1989 | * | * | * | 14 | 16,760 | 0.8419% |
1988 | * | * | * | 15 | 16,656 | 0.8682% |
1987 | * | * | * | 15 | 16,744 | 0.8947% |
1986 | * | * | * | 13 | 16,949 | 0.9201% |
1985 | * | * | * | 16 | 15,497 | 0.8406% |
1984 | * | * | * | 18 | 15,355 | 0.8529% |
1983 | * | * | * | 17 | 14,885 | 0.8329% |
1982 | * | * | * | 18 | 14,660 | 0.8095% |
1981 | * | * | * | 20 | 13,799 | 0.7728% |
1980 | * | * | * | 22 | 12,544 | 0.7055% |
1979 | * | * | * | 22 | 11,071 | 0.6432% |
1978 | * | * | * | 30 | 8,171 | 0.4977% |
1977 | * | * | * | 34 | 7,199 | 0.4381% |
1976 | * | * | * | 49 | 5,646 | 0.3595% |
1975 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,680 | 0.3001% |
1974 | * | * | * | 92 | 3,271 | 0.2090% |
1973 | * | * | * | 130 | 2,178 | 0.1402% |
1972 | * | * | * | 161 | 1,812 | 0.1124% |
1971 | * | * | * | 180 | 1,715 | 0.0980% |
1970 | * | * | * | 243 | 1,287 | 0.0703% |
1969 | * | * | * | 277 | 1,025 | 0.0582% |
1968 | * | * | * | 294 | 883 | 0.0517% |
1967 | * | * | * | 358 | 629 | 0.0366% |
1966 | * | * | * | 401 | 527 | 0.0300% |
1965 | * | * | * | 403 | 524 | 0.0287% |
1964 | * | * | * | 445 | 478 | 0.0244% |
1963 | * | * | * | 482 | 402 | 0.0202% |
1962 | * | * | * | 499 | 376 | 0.0186% |
1961 | * | * | * | 535 | 335 | 0.0161% |
1960 | * | * | * | 588 | 283 | 0.0136% |
1959 | * | * | * | 695 | 207 | 0.0100% |
1958 | * | * | * | 781 | 164 | 0.0079% |
1957 | * | * | * | 868 | 137 | 0.0065% |
1956 | * | * | * | 912 | 122 | 0.0059% |
1955 | * | * | * | 851 | 130 | 0.0065% |
1954 | * | * | * | 934 | 107 | 0.0054% |
1953 | * | * | * | 954 | 98 | 0.0051% |
1952 | * | * | * | 893 | 107 | 0.0056% |
1951 | * | * | * | 929 | 98 | 0.0053% |
1950 | * | * | * | 970 | 87 | 0.0049% |
1949 | * | * | * | 926 | 92 | 0.0052% |
1948 | * | * | * | 923 | 88 | 0.0051% |
1947 | * | * | * | 955 | 86 | 0.0047% |
1946 | * | * | * | 830 | 99 | 0.0061% |
1945 | * | * | * | 939 | 66 | 0.0049% |
1916 | * | * | * | 949 | 52 | 0.0048% |
1914 | * | * | * | 954 | 38 | 0.0048% |
1913 | * | * | * | 901 | 35 | 0.0054% |
1910 | * | * | * | 812 | 28 | 0.0067% |
1909 | * | * | * | 933 | 19 | 0.0052% |
1908 | * | * | * | 882 | 20 | 0.0056% |
1907 | * | * | * | 761 | 24 | 0.0071% |
1906 | * | * | * | 920 | 16 | 0.0051% |
1905 | * | * | * | 873 | 18 | 0.0058% |
1904 | * | * | * | 641 | 29 | 0.0099% |
1901 | * | * | * | 921 | 13 | 0.0051% |
1900 | * | * | * | 971 | 15 | 0.0047% |
1899 | * | * | * | 985 | 11 | 0.0044% |
1898 | * | * | * | 888 | 15 | 0.0055% |
1897 | * | * | * | 828 | 15 | 0.0060% |
1896 | * | * | * | 790 | 17 | 0.0067% |
1895 | * | * | * | 789 | 16 | 0.0065% |
1894 | * | * | * | 909 | 12 | 0.0051% |
1893 | * | * | * | 768 | 15 | 0.0067% |
1892 | * | * | * | 961 | 10 | 0.0044% |
1891 | * | * | * | 896 | 10 | 0.0051% |
1890 | * | * | * | 873 | 10 | 0.0050% |
1889 | * | * | * | 954 | 8 | 0.0042% |
1888 | * | * | * | 898 | 9 | 0.0048% |
1887 | * | * | * | 795 | 9 | 0.0058% |
1884 | * | * | * | 931 | 6 | 0.0044% |
1881 | * | * | * | 836 | 5 | 0.0051% |
1880 | * | * | * | 583 | 9 | 0.0092% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |